Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  229 /302 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 229 /302 Next Page
Page Background

229

臺大管理論叢

28

卷第

2

Table 12 Strengths of Influence for Criteria

Criteria

Sum of Columns (D) Sum of Rows (R)

Prominence

(D+R)

Relation

(D - R)

A1 Credit Risk

4.6161

4.6370

9.2531

-0.0209

A2 Profitability Risk

5.1478

5.5711

10.7188

-0.4233

A3 Strategic Risk

5.5203

5.2049

10.7251

0.3154

A4 Legal Risk

4.5725

3.9688

8.5413

0.6036

A5 Cost Risk

4.5510

4.7113

9.2623

-0.1603

B1 Integration Risk

5.1269

5.0386

10.1655

0.0883

B2 Reputational Risk

4.6390

5.4599

10.0989

-0.8210

B3 Liquidity Risk

4.5417

4.4183

8.9600

0.1234

B4 Privacy Risk

4.1497

3.7169

7.8666

0.4328

B5 Trust Risk

4.4328

4.7491

9.1819

-0.3163

C1 Information Risk

4.2348

3.9343

8.1691

0.3005

C2 Cultural Risk

4.0360

3.9557

7.9917

0.0803

C3 Transactional Risk

3.9319

3.8571

7.7890

0.0748

C4 Operational Risk

4.9228

5.3909

10.3137

-0.4682

C5 Competitive Risk

4.5548

4.8712

9.4260

-0.3165

C6 Service Risk

4.0920

4.4714

8.5634

-0.3794

C7 Security Risk

4.3451

4.5567

8.9018

-0.2116

C8 Transition Risk

4.3361

4.0443

8.3805

0.2918

D1 Management Risk

5.1599

4.9827

10.1426

0.1773

D2 Leadership Risk

5.1474

4.5648

9.7121

0.5826

D3 Intellectual Property Risk

3.4959

3.4493

6.9452

0.0466

As listed in Table 11, the business process as well as learning and growth dimensions

yielded positive values in the strength of influence. Learning and growth yielded the

highest values in the strength of influence among the four dimensions. In addition, the

business process and learning and growth dimensions did not yield any significant

differences in prominence. Therefore, learning and growth was the driving factor for

solving the core problem, and thus, this factor should be prioritized as the primary

dimension for improvement. Moreover, using the information in Table 12, a causal

relationship diagram was drawn (Figure 3), and unweighted supermatrices for the

dimensions and criteria were established. Strategic, integration, management, and

leadership risks appeared to be the risk factors in the core zone of strong and influencing

factors. This result was consistent with those reported in past studies that have shown

stronger and more independent governance of BHCs to be closely related with lower