Page 34 - 臺大管理論叢第32卷第2期
P. 34

Heavy Work Investment and Job Burnout: The Moderating Role of Health Promotion and Psychological
               Capital



               Heavy Work Investment and Job Burnout: The Moderating Role
               of Health Promotion and Psychological Capital


               Shu-Ling Chen, Department of Business Administration and Graduate Institute of Logistics
                     Management, National Dong Hwa University
               Hsin-Hua Hsiung, Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University
               Chiu-Pin Chen, Division of Tourism, Recreation, and Leisure Studies, Department of Business
                     Administration, National Dong Hwa University



                             1. Introduction and Theoretical Framework


                    In general, employees fully investing in their work are rewarded with recognition and
               praise from the managers of their organization (Harter, Schmidt, and Hayes, 2002). In the

               existing literature, the phenomenon of employees working long hours is termed as “heavy
               work investment,” which refers to individuals’ striving to commit themselves to work,
               strongly focusing on work tasks, or being highly dedicated to their work (e.g., Snir and
               Harpaz, 2012). Workaholism and work engagement are the two common types of heavy

               work investment (Schaufeli, 2016; Schaufeli, Taris, and Bakker, 2006; Snir and Harpaz,
               2012).
                    Some studies have investigated the various negative consequences (e.g., job burnout)
               associated with these two common types. Even though several important findings have

               been provided from these studies, this field continues to have two research gaps. First,
               while Gillet, Morin, Sandrin, and Houle (2018) and van Beek, Taris, and Schaufeli
               (2011) both explore the effects and consequences of workaholism and work engagement
               simultaneously, nonetheless, they both adopt a cross-sectional design. Therefore, their

               findings raise a concern about the causality. Our current study argues that due to the
               different psychological states embedded in workaholism and work engagement (van Beek
               et al., 2011), these two types of heavy work investment should influence employees’ job
               burnout differently. To clarify this issue, there is a need to not only examine workaholism

               and work engagement simultaneously, but also collect data at multiple time points to
               understand the actual consequences of these two types of heavy work investment.
                    Second, the relationship between heavy work investment and job burnout remains
               inconclusive. Different types of heavy work investment may have varying degrees




                                                      26
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39