Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  67 /274 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 67 /274 Next Page
Page Background

臺大管理論叢

27

卷第

4

67

of resources Advantech needed to respond to the constraints. We also examined the timing

and situation in which Advantech interacted with Kontron’s low-power and high-power

partners. Focusing on the process by which Advantech constructed symbolic meanings of

resources, we considered the change of power dynamics among Advantech, Kontron, and

their partners as the outcome of bricolage.

Two episodes illustrate how Advantech inversed its power position by recognizing

opportunities in the strengths of high-power player actor, constructing resources with high-

power players’ partners and redefining the rule of the competition. The first episode shows

how Advantech established partnerships with Kontron’s local dealers by amplifying the

dealers’ sense of crisis. Kontron’s aggressive approach to its customer relationships

marginalized its local distributors and even threatened their survival. To approach the local

distributors, Advantech first made them aware of their dire position with Kontron and then

offered to establish joint-venture alliance with them to gain resources that it would not have

otherwise. The joint-venture partnership was mutually beneficial to Advantech and the local

distributors. Advantech built its distribution network in the least possible amount of time and

lowest possible cost, and local distributors survived in the market by selling Advantech’s

products to mid-tier state-owned enterprises (SOEs) without appearing to be disloyal to

Kontron. Consequently, Advantech was able to inverse its power position by redefining new

rules of competition with Kontron so that the competition was no longer based on providing

industrial computing technology for top-tier clients but on serving mid-tier customers and

using network resources in China.

The second episode illustrates how Advantech exploited service disruption experienced

by Kontron’ customers and constructed resources to win over those customers. Kontron’s

stringent approach to technological maintenance and service caused its mid-tier SOE

customers severe operational disruption and inconvenience. Once again, Advantech saw

Kontron’s aggressiveness in technological maintenance and customer service as its weakness

and intended to win over those of customers. Advantech first provided them on-site

engineering service, helping them with procurement, and then customized technology

specification in “quasi-military standards” so that customers could mix and match different

technology standards according to their operations. As Kontron focused most of its attention

on top-tier customers instead of on SOE customers, Advantech made these SOE customers

its privileged customers and helped them with maintenance and procurement. Advantech

redefined the context of the competition, which was no longer based on rigorous

technological solutions but on customized services. Advantech also developed a new market