Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  51 / 274 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 51 / 274 Next Page
Page Background

臺大管理論叢

27

卷第

3

51

Does Benevolent Leadership Always Lead to Organizational

Citizenship Behavior? The Mediated Moderation Effect of

Manipulative Intention and Trust

1. Purpose/Objective

Previous studies have indicated that benevolent leadership in Chinese organizations

results in positive outcomes. However, one issue that needs exploring is whether benevolent

leadership influences subordinates effectively if they regard it as pseudo-benevolent–using

manipulation, control, and popular support as leadership skills. If subordinates no longer feel

gratitude towards their leader, such leadership actually leads to a conflict between a leader

and his or her subordinates and undermines personnel harmony (Farh and Cheng, 2000; Farh

et al., 2008). What factors that cause this reaction remain unknown, as do its outcomes for

those subordinates. Based on this research gap, this study aims to explore what factors leave

subordinates unmoved by benevolent leadership and examine the outcome of such

subordinates’ behavior.

The attribute theory (Heider, 1958; Kelley, 1973; Weiner, 1986) refers to how

individuals explain their own or others’ behavior (Martinko et al., 2011; Martinko, Harvey, et

al., 2007). The basic assumption is that people want to understand the reasons of significant

life events, and how they attribute causes to the events will affect their responses (Heider,

1958). The consequences are attributed to ability, effort, nature of the task, and fortune. The

causal reasoning people employ to refer to other’s behavior also influences the subsequent

response; the so-called discounting principle has been demonstrated in a number of well-

known studies in social perception (Morris and Larrick, 1995).

Green and Mitchell (1979) applied the attribution theory to leadership theories

(Martinko, Harvey, et al., 2007; Martinko et al., 2011), which proposes that how leaders

interpret the subordinates’ behavior will affect their leadership and interaction with their

subordinates. However, Dasborough and Ashkanasy (2002) suggested that how followers

attribute leadership behavior and its motivation also results in emotional reactions and

behaviors. Moreover, several studies have examined how attribution styles influence the

leader-member exchange (Martinko, Moss, et al., 2007). Therefore, this study attempts to

Chia-Wu Lin

, Professor, Department of Business Administration, National Dong Hwa University

Wan-Hsien Hu

, Part-Time Research Assistant, Department of Business Administration, National Dong

Hwa University

Jian-Bin Shih

, Assistant Professor, Department of Leisure and Recreation Management, Da-Yeh

University