Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  54 / 274 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 54 / 274 Next Page
Page Background

仁慈領導一定能讓部屬產生組織公民行為嗎?領導者操弄意圖知覺與部屬信任的中介式調節作用

54

extends the link between benevolent leadership and positive outcomes as well as discussing

the psychology behind it (e.g., Chen et al., 2014).

There are several contributions to our work. First, according to the attribution theory of

leadership process, this empirical study demonstrates that benevolent leadership does not

always results in positive outcome if a subordinate perceives strong manipulative intention

from his or her leader. On the other hand, perceiving little manipulative intention implies that

an employee engages more OCB to reciprocate genuineconcern and care from the supervisor.

Second, we also conducted a simple mediated test and the result revealed that trust in

leader and in organization completely mediated the relationship between benevolent

leadership and OCB, which implies that trust is indeed an important mediator of leadership

processes (e.g., Chen et al., 2014).

Third, up to now, only few research works have examined the psychological mechanism

between benevolent leadership and employee outcomes, let alone the mediated moderation

effect of the mechanism. To fill this research gap, our research identified that a high level of

benevolent leadership and low level of perception of manipulation could lead to high levels

of employee trust and OCB.

In practical terms, a benevolent leader should demonstrate authentic benevolence and

avoid manipulating employees. Once subordinates perceive too much manipulative behavior

from their leader, they will reduce trust as well as OCB. The leaders should perform their

benevolence appropriately and distribute resources with fairness and objectivity. Too much

concern and too many resources offered to a specific employee may cause him or her to

doubt the motivation of the leader, whereas other employees also lose trust in both the leader

and the organization. Leaders need to find the equilibrium between both excessive and

deficient care and concern.