Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  346 / 414 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 346 / 414 Next Page
Page Background

亞洲地區審計品質研究回顧

346

Review of Studies on Audit Quality in Asia

1. Purpose and Contribution

This study reviews empirical research on audit quality in Asia markets. We restrict our

review to papers published in the A+ and A tier 1 accounting journals, ranked by the Ministry

of Science and Technology, from 2000 to 2015. The first part of this study introduces major

capital markets and audit markets in Asia. The second part reviews the definitions and

proxies of audit quality widely used in the literature. The third and fourth parts review the

cross-country and single country audit quality research from the perspectives of audit

demand, audit supply as well as the effects of regulatory intervention. The results indicate

that among the single country research, China audit market studies are ranked number one

followed by Taiwan studies. As to the research topics, most cross-countries studies focus on

the topics related to audit demand. Single country studies, however, either examine the

effects of the regulation changes or take advantage of the unique data set resulting from

specific requirements in a given country to test the audit theory. This study concludes by

assessing the challenges and limitations of cross-country research, analyzing the factors that

make single-country research popular, and providing future research avenues in audit quality

for Asian countries.

2. Capital Markets and Audit Markets in Asia

We introduce the capital markets and audit markets in China, Hong Kong, India,

Indonesia, Israel, Japan, Malaysia, Pakistan, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan,

Thailand, and Turkey. In these countries, accounting standards may be set by the

government, CPA association, or independent foundation. However, the auditing standards

are usually set by CPA associations. Most countries adopt or converge to International

Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Although India Bombay Stock Exchange has the

largest number, more than 5,000 of listed companies, none of the audit studies reviewed in

this paper investigates this market alone. Similarly, Japan Tokyo Exchange has the highest

total market value in Asia, whereas only two studies analyze Japanese audit market. It

appears that there is a gap between the size of the capital market and the focus of the single

country audit study.

Hsiao-Lun Lin

, Associate Professor, Department of Accountancy, National Taipei University

Chan-Jane Lin

, Professor, Department of Accounting, National Taiwan University