

亞洲地區審計品質研究回顧
352
Studies
, (43): 27-61. doi: 10.6552/JOAR.2006.43.3)
董廣平,
1998
,臺灣會計博士的過去、現在、未來,
會計研究月刊
,
5
月號:
21-26
。
(Dong, Guang-Ping. 1998. The past, present and future of Accounting PhD in
Taiwan.
Accounting Research Monthly
, May: 21-26.)
廖秀梅與戚務君,
2014
,強制合夥會計師輪調當年度的審計品質分析,
臺大管理論叢
,
25
卷
1
期:
233-257
。
doi: 10.6226/NTURM2014.APR.GE.30 (Liao, Hsiu-Mei,
and Chi, Wu-Chun. 2014. Audit quality during the first year of mandatory audit-
partner rotation.
NTU Management Review
, 25 (1): 233-257. doi: 10.6226/
NTURM2014.APR.GE.30)
劉嘉雯與王泰昌,
2005
,繼續經營有重大疑慮審計意見:第
33
號審計準則公報之影響,
管理學報
,
22
卷
4
期:
525-549
。
doi: 10.6504/JOM.2005.22.04.07 (Liu, Chia-
Wen, and Wang, Tay-Chang. 2005. Going concern opinions: Before and after SAS
No. 33.
Journal of Management
, 22 (4): 525-549. doi: 10.6504/JOM.2005.
22.04.07)
,
2008
,會計師任期與審計品質之關連性研究,
管理評論
,
27
卷
4
期:
1-28
。
(Liu, Chia-Wen, and Wang, Tay-Chang. 2008. Auditor tenure and audit quality.
Management Review
, 27 (4): 1-28.)
劉嘉雯、王泰昌與賴信蒼,
2009
,訴訟風險與大型會計師事務所之客戶財務風險可接
受水準,
臺大管理論叢
,
20
卷
1
期:
1-40
。
doi: 10.6226/NTURM2009.20.1.1
(Liu, Chia-Wen, Wang, Tay-Chang, and Lai, Shin-Tsang. 2009. Litigation risk and
large audit firms’ acceptable level of clients’ financial risk.
NTU Management
Review
, 20 (1): 1-40. doi: 10.6226/NTURM2009.20.1.1)
薛敏正、林嬋娟與邱彥毅,
2015
,國內會計博士教育學術成果分析,
人文與社會科學
簡訊
,
16
卷
3
期:
16-25
。
(Shiue, Min-Jeng, Lin, Chan-Jane, and Chiou, Yan-
Yi. 2015. A longitudinal study of Taiwanese accounting Ph.D’s research
productivity.
Humanities and Social Sciences Newsletter Quarterly
, 16 (3):
16-25.)
Aobdia, D., Lin, C. J., and Petacchi, R. 2015. Capital market consequences of audit partner
quality.
The Accounting Review
, 90 (6): 2143-2176. doi:
10.2308/accr-51054
Bagherpour, M. A., Monroe, G. S., and Shailer, G. 2014. Government and managerial
influence on auditor switching under partial privatization.
Journal of Accounting
and Public Policy
, 33 (4): 372-390.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2014.04.004
Bhattacharya, U., Daouk, H., and Welker, M. 2003. The world price of earnings opacity.
The
Accounting Review
, 78 (3): 641-678. doi: 10.2308/accr.2003.78.3.641