Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  96 / 372 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 96 / 372 Next Page
Page Background

九尾數定價效果在不同評估模式中的侷限:分別、聯合與依序評估

96

magnitude in SE and JE modes, but also were consistent with the results of Study 1.

3.4.4 Response Time

In order to measure the differences in cognitive effort between SE and JE modes, Study

4 recorded the response time following the studies of Garbarino and Edell (1997), and

Thomas and Morwitz (2005). Comparisons among each group were then made. For example,

the total response time shown in Table 5 of S and K (

M

S

= 13.1 sec,

M

K

= 12.6 sec,

M

Total

=

25.7 sec) was compared with the response time of S-K in JE (

M

S-K

= 33.5 sec), yielding a

difference in response time of 7.8 sec. The curve plotted by the difference of response time

in each group is shown in Figure 2, and the results indicate a decreasing curve that is

proportionate to task complexity.

3.4.5 Discussion

As predicted, the results from Study 4 proved a boundary condition of the nine-ending

effect that presented a decreasing curve of the difference in perceived price magnitude

between SE and JE modes. That is, increasing degrees of task complexity in different

evaluation modes influenced individuals to use a heuristic or systematic process to estimate

the nine-ending prices. Furthermore, the results of the differences in response time showed a

consistent decreasing curve that followed the difference in perceived price magnitude. More

precisely, Study 4 indicated that people may tend to use a heuristic process to evaluate prices

when the higher complexity of the JE condition requires more cognitive effort exceeding

one’s limited cognitive capacity and less response time; by contrast, they tend to use a

systematic process to estimate nine-ending prices when the complexity of the condition does

not exceed their cognitive capacity.

Table 4 Results in Study 4

Modes Mean of Perceived Price Magnitude

Interaction

c

Nine-Ending Zero-Ending Diff.

a

Diff.

b

F

(1, 38) P-value

S-K

SE

3.16

4.19

1.03

0.90 32.916 0.000***

JE

3.73

3.96

0.23

S-K-R-T

SE

3.25

4.16

0.91

0.67 15.344 0.000***

JE

3.81

4.05

0.24

S-K-R-T-P-U SE

3.27

4.17

0.90

0.13

0.468 0.498

JE

3.62

4.39

0.77

a

Diff.: Difference of mean of perceived price magnitude between nine- and zero-ending price

b

Diff.: Difference of mean of perceived price magnitude between SE and JE modes

c

Interaction: Interaction among evaluation modes and the difference of nine- and zero-ending prices

*** Significant at 0.01 significance level.