Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  94 / 372 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 94 / 372 Next Page
Page Background

九尾數定價效果在不同評估模式中的侷限:分別、聯合與依序評估

94

proposed (Bettman, Johnson, and Payne, 1990; Bettman and Kakkar, 1977; Campbell, 1988;

Jiang and Benbasat, 2007). However, decision effectiveness begins to decline until task

complexity reaches a reversed point induced by an individual’s limited cognitive capacity

(Swait and Adamowicz, 2001). In sum, cognitive loading is an important factor in decision

switching (Garbarino and Edell, 1997).

In view of these studies and the HSM, this paper maintains that if the increasing

demand on cognitive capacity induced by greater task complexity exceeds what people may

possess, there will be an increased tendency to use a heuristic process that will lower

cognitive effort and response time. In other words, the difference in the perceived price

magnitude between nine- and zero-ending digits will keep on increasing in the JE mode

when the task becomes more and more complex. No nine-ending effect will occur both in the

SE and JE modes when the degree of task complexity exceeds an individual’s cognitive

loading because people will just make a rash judgment. Following the study of Thomas and

Morwitz (2005), Study 4 tries to explore the bounded effect of nine-ending prices with

increasing degrees of task complexity in the different evaluation modes and measure the

response time so as to confirm which processes people tend to use. The following hypothesis

is proposed:

H5: The greater the task complexity, the less cognitive effort is expended in the JE

mode, and the less difference in the perceived price magnitude between the SE and

JE modes.

3.4.1 Method

One hundred undergraduate students (sixty-one males and thirty-nine females) were

recruited from a large southern university. The stimuli were the same as in Studies 1, 2, and

3. There were two items of perceived price magnitude within each product category, each

with different fictional brand names (nail clippers: S and K; battery: R and T; baseball cap: P

and U) and ending prices. The prices of the stimuli were manipulated to have a nine-ending

price with a lower value in the leftmost digits (S: $1.99; R: $2.99; P: $6.99), whereas the

prices of the K, T and U-branded nail clippers were manipulated to have a zero-ending prices

with higher values in the leftmost digits ($2.00, $3.00, and $7.00). This study utilized a

between-subjects design with one factor (price magnitude) and five-levels (separate: S, K;

joint: S-K, S-K-R-T, S-K-R-T-P-U). The participants were randomly divided into eight

subgroups and were only asked to state the perceived price magnitude of S and K. In order to

resolve the order effect, a counterbalance design was used. For example, S-K-R-T and R-T-