Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  95 / 372 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 95 / 372 Next Page
Page Background

臺大管理論叢

26

卷第

2

95

S-K both comprised one half of the S-K-R-T group; S-K-R-T-P-U comprised only one third

of the S-K-R-T-P-U group and R-T-S-K-P-U and R-T-P-U-S-K comprised the other two-

thirds. The results showed no order effect among these groups.

3.4.2 Dependent Variable

Study 4 had participants answer questions regarding pricing perception by responding

to the same statements as Study 1. Besides, following the study of Thomas and Morwitz

(2005), Study 4 measured the response time that is often used by numerical cognition

researchers to determine the cognitive processes used by participants (e.g., Dehaene, 1997;

Dehaene et al., 1990; Hinrichs, Yurko, and Hu, 1981). Chaiken (1980) also proposes that the

response time one spends on finishing a task can be regarded as a good way of measuring

cognitive effort. In brief, the shorter the response time one needs to evaluate the price

magnitude, the more likely that person is in a heuristic process. By contrast, the longer the

response time, the more likely the nine- and zero-ending digits are being evaluated in a

systematic process.

3.4.3 Results

In Study 4, in order to re-confirm the boundary conditions of nine-ending effect, we used

an ANOVA to examine the results. As shown in Table 4, the interaction among two evaluation

conditions, high and low task complexity, and nine- and zero-ending prices was significant

(

F

(3, 76) = 14.330,

p

< 0.01). That is, the difference of perceived price magnitude between SE

and JE was a decreasing curve when task complexity was increasing (see Figure 1).

Furthermore, in order to re-confirm the inference that the increasing degree of task complexity

would play an important role on nine-ending effect, first, the difference between SE and JE in

S-K was examined and showed the significance (

Difference

SE

= 1.03 vs.

Difference

JE

= 0.23,

F

S-K

(1, 38) = 32.916,

p

< 0.01). This finding was consistent with Study 1 that nine-ending

effect occurred under the tasks that are less complex. Secondly, the difference in S-K-R-T was

also significant (

Difference

SE

= 0.91 vs.

Difference

JE

= 0.24,

F

S-K-R-T

(1, 38) = 15.344,

p

< 0.01).

This finding also proved the hypothesis that nine-ending effect was supported when the

degree of task complexity did not exceed an individual’s cognitive loading.

Combined with both of the results, the existence of nine-ending effect was re-confirmed

to be the same as that in Study 1 under less complex conditions. However, as expected, the

difference in S-K-R-T-P-U, a condition with high task complexity that may exceed one’s

cognitive burden, was insignificant (

Difference

SE

= 0.90 vs.

Difference

JE

= 0.77,

F

S-K-R-T-P-U

(1, 38)

= 0.468,

p

= 0.498). These results not only re-confirmed H5 that the more task complexity, the

less nine-ending effect between the comparison of the difference of the perceived price