Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  255 /302 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 255 /302 Next Page
Page Background

255

臺大管理論叢

28

卷第

2

suppliers would imply lower audit complexity, reducing audit efforts and thus, leading to

lower audit fees. They further argue that the audit quality is not impaired even though

lower audit fees are charged on firms with customer concentration. They find that

suppliers who share the same auditor with at least one of their major customers enjoy

additional audit fee discounts, and these suppliers are less likely to experience

restatements, suggesting a positive link between audit quality and major customer

dependency. Chen, Chang, Chen, and Kim (2014) further find that audit fees are

negatively associated with the major buyer-related supply chain knowledge. They show

that auditors with more knowledge of supply chain provide more discounts on audit fees

to their clients when the major customer is also the auditor’s client. They argue that for

audit firms that have engaged the client’s supply chain partners, these audit firms have

better understanding of the client’s industry. The audit firms are expected to better

evaluate the client’s key accounting figures since these numbers are close linked to those

of the client’s major customer, resulting in higher audit quality, therefore the auditor can

command fee premium.

2.3.2 Stock Market Perceptive

Many studies have documented evidences on the market reactions to the information

along the supply chain. Olsen and Dietrich (1985) give the first evidence that information

disclosures made by retailers may affect the security prices of supplier firms. They find

that suppliers with a relatively larger proportion of sales to a specific retailer show a

relatively larger change in price after the retailer’s monthly sales announcement. They

argue that investors may revise their expectation of the sales level of supplier firms after

the announcement, and that provide us evidence on vertical information transfers between

customers and suppliers.

Pandit et al. (2011) provide further evidence that the degree of transfer of a

customer’s quarterly earnings announcement to suppliers’ security returns is positively

related to the strength of the economic bond between the suppliers and customers,

seasonal changes in the customer revenue and cost of goods sold, the level of

macroeconomic uncertainty, and the informativeness of the announcement. They contend

that for suppliers that sell large portion of sales to a major customer, information provided

by customer’s earning announcement can alter investors’ expectation about the supplier’s

cash flows and future earnings. Guan, Wong, and Zhang (2015) show that analysts who

follow a covered firm’s customer will more accurately forecast the supplier firm’s earning

than those who do not. They also find that although both types of analysts respond to