Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  191 /304 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 191 /304 Next Page
Page Background

191

臺大管理論叢

28

卷第

1

divergence is less in countries with better investor protection when investment

opportunities are good, which is consistent with our hypothesis. In countries in which

minority shareholders have legal rights upon which they can rely and are thus less alert to

expropriation, controlling shareholders with a large control divergence have less need to

mask their expropriation activities by paying higher dividends. Our results suggest that

strong legal institutions play an effective monitoring role in the determination of the

dividend policies of controlling shareholders by mitigating the efforts of these

shareholders to mask their expropriation activities. We do not observe consistent patterns

for the coefficients of

Diverge*Legal

(

Right

or

Disclosure

), which indicates that

investment opportunities are an important determinant of dividend policy (Fama and

French, 2001).

The standalone control variables are reported in Panel A and are mostly significant,

as predicted in previous studies (Fama and French, 2001; La Porta et al., 2000; Faccio et

al., 2001). For instance, the coefficients of growth potential (

G

) are significantly negative

in all of the specifications, which implies that faster growing firms pay lower dividends.

The tax variable (

Dta

) is significantly positive in all of the specifications. The

(unreported) control variables in Panels B and C display almost the same patterns as those

in Panel A. In terms of explanatory power, the adjusted

R

2

is the highest with

IADvd/CFO

(23.52% in Panel A) and the lowest with

IADvd/E

(7.01% in Panel A), which may reflect

the pervasive earnings management and low earnings quality of firms with a large control

divergence (Fan and Wong, 2002; Haw et al., 2004).

We rerun regression equation (1) on the four dividend payout ratios before adjusting

for industry effects and add industry dummies (based on the 2-digit primary SIC code) to

the regression. Appendix B reports the coefficients and significant levels, which are quite

similar to those that are reported in Table 4 and from which it can be seen that the thrust of

our results remains the same.