Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  44 / 372 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 44 / 372 Next Page
Page Background

發言或緘默:心理安全與自我效能在社會資本影響社群網站使用者知識分享行為上所扮演的中介角色

44

capabilities influence people’s perceptions of self-efficacy.

2.3.1 Cognitive Capability

Bandura (1981) contends that the types of cues individuals have learned to use (e.g., the

cognitive processing of self-efficacy information) can influence personal efficacy. In social

learning studies, self-efficacy stems from four sources of information (Bandura, 1982). First,

“performance accomplishment” provides the most influential source of self-efficacy

information because it is based on previous mastery experiences. Previous successful (failed)

experiences increase (decrease) self-efficacy. Second, self-efficacy is influenced by

“vicarious experiences of observing others’ success through their efforts,” because seeing

similar others’ successful performance can increase the self-efficacy of observers who judge

themselves with similar capabilities of fulfilling comparable activities. Third, “verbal

persuasion and allied types of social influences that individuals possess certain capabilities to

cope with situations successfully,” indicating that individuals believe that their own

capabilities help them achieve goals. Verbal persuasion has the greatest impact on

individuals who believe that they can effect certain outcomes through their actions

(Chambliss and Murray, 1979a, 1979b). Fourth, an individual’s “physiological state” when

facing challenges can affect self-efficacy. Individuals interpret their physical arousal in a

stressful situation as a signal of vulnerability to failure. Because high arousal can lead to

failed performance, individuals tend to expect success when they are not defeated by such

arousal.

2.3.2 Social Capability

Social capability, such as support and interpersonal trust in the social environments and

an individual’s centrality in the social network, can also affect self-efficacy. Social

environments may either put constraints on what individuals can do or assist them in doing

something properly. For example, in Bandura (1982) study on post-coronary rehabilitation

(i.e., recovering from a heart attack), patients’ self-efficacy was affected not only by their

cognitive capability but also by their social capability. In recovery processes, the

reconstruction of self-efficacy to health promotion must be salient. Usually, psychological

recovery in resuming their vocational and social lives is slow for patients who have had a

heart attack. In other words, psychological recovery from a heart attack is not an individual

but a social matter; those with spousal support tend to have higher self-efficacy.

Interpersonal trust also affects self-efficacy. Within the online context, one important

dimension of relationships is how community members with common interests and shared

goals establish peer relationships and interpersonal trust (Tseng and Kuo, 2010). As more