Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  42 / 372 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 42 / 372 Next Page
Page Background

發言或緘默:心理安全與自我效能在社會資本影響社群網站使用者知識分享行為上所扮演的中介角色

42

is interpersonal context specific and related to the social capital of an individual. This means

that psychological safety differs when people interact in different interpersonal contexts and

results in different individual levels of social capital. The first three dimensions address

characteristics of interactions among individuals and the social capital they derive from these

interactions; the fourth reflects the rules that shape an individual’s behavior. In addition,

Edmondson (2004) indicates five similar dimensions of psychological safety: trusting and

respectful interpersonal relationships, organizational interpersonal context support, leader

behavior, emergent group dynamics, and practice fields. Both Kahn (1990) and Edmondson

(2004) studies center on the interpersonal environment in which individuals feel safe (or

unsafe) to interact with others.

First, according to Kahn (1990) four-dimensional framework, when people believe that

their interpersonal relationships are supportive and trustworthy, they have a sense of

psychological safety and thus have more confidence in self-expression without fear or threat.

However, people who feel little connection with other members perceive a lower level of

psychological safety and tend to be silent. Second, Kahn’s group and intergroup dynamics

dimension represents the informal roles that affect members’ psychological safety

experience. In the workplace, depending on level of authority, competition, or gender,

members tend to play informal and unconscious roles. As Kahn (1990) depicts in his

architecture company study, the president plays the father role, supporting functional-level

members play the mother role, and other members play the child roles. When cast into these

roles, individuals vary in how much they engage in work role performances (Minuchin,

1974). Members’ psychological safety experience varies and depends on the roles they play

in the workplace. Third, beyond the informal roles, the formal power structure in the

workplace can also affect members’ perceptions of psychological safety. Research has shown

that supportive managerial behavior has a positive effect on creativity (Amabile, Conti,

Coon, Lazenby, and Herron, 1996; Deci, Connell, and Ryan, 1989). Creativity is a form of

self-expression, so it is likely to involve some degree of psychological safety in the

workplace. Thus, supportive managerial behavior can also enhance psychological safety.

Fourth, organizational norms are shared expectations about the general behaviors of

members in a social system (Hackman, 1986). Psychological safety is related to role

performances that clearly lie within the boundaries of organizational norms. Individuals feel

more psychologically safe when their behavior stays within the organizational norms. As

such, well-defined organizational norms can enrich individuals’ psychological safety

experiences.