Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  49 / 372 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 49 / 372 Next Page
Page Background

臺大管理論叢

26

卷第

2

49

and the relational dimension of social capital represents the support for individuals. When

individuals stay in an environment with significant competence and support, they gain a high

level of knowledge sharing self-efficacy. This discussion leads to the following hypotheses:

H5: Cognitive social capital positively affects individuals’ knowledge sharing self-

efficacy in SNSs.

H6: Relational social capital positively affects individuals’ knowledge sharing self-

efficacy in SNSs.

2.5 Antecedents of Knowledge Sharing Behavior in SNSs

Previous studies have investigated the antecedents of knowledge sharing in

organizations and virtual communities. Some focus on inherent motivational factors (Wasko

and Faraj, 2005); others focus on interpersonal conditions, such as social capital (Chiu, Hsu,

and Wang, 2006; Wasko and Faraj, 2005), social cognition (Chiu et al., 2006; Hsu et al.,

2007), trust (Ridings, Gefen, and Arinze, 2002), satisfaction (Chen, 2007), and the social

network (Wasko, Faraj, and Teigland, 2004); and still others focus on individuals’ attachment

to collective actions (Cheung and Lee, 2007; Wasko and Faraj, 2005; Wasko et al., 2004).

Because SNSs mainly contain users and their colleagues, relatives, and friends, factors

affecting individuals’ knowledge sharing in organizations and virtual communities may also

affect their knowledge sharing in SNSs. The subsections that follow address three major

determinants of knowledge sharing behavior in SNSs: social capital (Nahapiet and Ghoshal,

1998), psychological safety (Kahn, 1990), and knowledge sharing self-efficacy (Bandura,

1982).

2.5.1 Influence of Social Capital on Knowledge Sharing Behavior

Structural social capital captures the connection (Scott, 1991; Wasserman and Faust,

1994) and configuration (Krackhardt, 1994) of a social system, and it provides the channel

through which individuals can send and receive knowledge. In addition, both the language/

code and the narratives of cognitive social capital can affect the fluency of knowledge

sharing among people. Finally, relational social capital is also instrumental in interpersonal

knowledge sharing. Thus, we propose the following hypotheses:

H7: Structural social capital positively affects individuals’ knowledge sharing behavior

in SNSs.

H8: Cognitive social capital positively affects individuals’ knowledge sharing behavior

in SNSs.