Page 118 - 35-2
P. 118

Internal-External CSR Balance or Favoritism? Exploring the Impacts of Perceived Internal and External
               Corporate Social Responsibility on Employee Organizational Identification from the Attribution Perspective



               Internal-External CSR Balance or Favoritism? Exploring the
               Impacts of Perceived Internal and External Corporate Social
               Responsibility on Employee Organizational Identification from

               the Attribution Perspective


               Shu-Chen Chen, Department of Business Administration, Ming Chuan University
               Chih-Jen Hu, Department of Business Administration, Ming Chuan University
               Na-Ting Liu, Department of Business Administration, Ming Chuan University



                                           1. Purpose/Objective



                    Although corporate social responsibility (CSR) is often classified as internal CSR
               (ICSR) or external CSR (ECSR), many empirical studies still conceptualize CSR as a
               unidimensional construct and overlook the potential differential effects of perceived ICSR
               and ECSR on employee attitudes and behaviors. According to attribution theory (Kelley,
               1973), employees interpret CSR activities on the basis of their perceived underlying

               motives, which can be broadly categorized as either substantive (i.e. genuinely aimed at
               social welfare) or symbolic (i.e. driven by impression management). Although multiple
               studies have indicated a relationship between CSR perception and employees’ attribution

               of organizational motives, the effects of the inconsistencies between perceived ICSR
               and ECSR on employees’ motivational attributions remain underexplored. Specifically,
               CSR is regarded as a factor that enhances organizational identification. However, social
               identity theory (Tajfel, 1975) posits that these outcomes strongly depend on the perceived
               authenticity and prestige of each organization. When employees perceive CSR initiatives

               as symbolic, particularly when ECSR is emphasized at the expense of ICSR, they tend
               to experience a sense of disappointment, which may reduce their identification with their
               organization. By contrast, when employees perceive CSR as substantive, they tend to

               experience a sense of enhanced self-worth through their affiliation with a morally reputable
               organization. In this study, we develop a parallel mediated moderation model in which the
               interaction between perceived ICSR and ECSR influences organizational identification
               through dual attribution pathways (i.e. substantive and symbolic).






                                                     110
   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123