Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  253 /342 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 253 /342 Next Page
Page Background

臺大管理論叢

27

卷第

2S

253

Hansmann, 1985; Hoerger et al., 1990; Mayers and Smith, 1990; Adiel, 1996; Garven and

Lamm-Tennant, 2003; Cole and McCullough, 2006; Cole et al., 2010; Powell and Sommer,

2007; Cummins et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2008; Garven et al., 2014; Shiu, 2011; and Ho and

Lai, 2014). For example, Mayer and Smith (1990) suggest that the organizational form of

insurers is related to their risk taking and reinsurance demand. They suggest that mutual

insurers purchase more reinsurance than stock insurers.

9

On the other hand, Adams (1996) suggests that stock insurers use more reinsurance than

mutual insurers. Cole and McCullough (2006) find that stock insurers purchase more

reinsurance. Cummins et al. (2008) also suggest that stock insurers purchase more

reinsurance from non-affiliated reinsurers than mutual insurers.

10

Garven and Lamm-Tennant

(2003) indicate that an insignificant relation between organizational structure and

reinsurance demand. In summary, the empirical evidence on the relation between

organizational structure and reinsurance is inconclusive.

In addition, the relation between organizational structure and reinsurance demand is

likely to be in equilibrium prior to CEO turnovers. Whether new CEOs will change the

relation between organizational structure and reinsurance demand depends on the risk-taking

behavior of new CEOs. Since we cannot predict whether new CEOs resulting from turnovers

of mutual insurers will have higher or lower risk-taking behavior than new CEOs of stock

insurers, the sign of the interaction term between routine (voluntary) or non-routine (forced)

CEO turnover and organizational structure on reinsurance demand cannot be predicted. This

leads to the following null hypothesis:

Hypothesis 4: There is no interaction effect between CEO turnover and organizational

structure on reinsurance demand after CEO turnover.

2.5 The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Reinsurance Demand

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires CEOs to be responsible for the financial

statements of the firm. Since the implementation of this act, boards of directors have become

extremely cautious about their roles. Wang et al. (2010) examine risk-taking behavior in

relation to CEO turnover prior to and following the implementation of SOX.

11

They find that

CEOs have become significantly more risk averse following the passage of SOX. It is

9 Mayers and Smith (1990) find that widely held stock insurers purchase less reinsurance than closely held,

single-owner, and association-owned insurers.

10 Cummins et al. (2008) use the data from 1995 to 2003 in the U.S. property casualty insurance industry.

11 Final sample includes 670 CEO turnovers from 1999 to 2005.