Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  249 /342 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 249 /342 Next Page
Page Background

臺大管理論叢

27

卷第

2S

249

demand after CEO turnover. Specifically, mutual insurers with non-routine (forced) CEO

turnover are more likely to purchase less reinsurance from affiliated reinsurers. Finally, our

results also show that insurers with CEO turnover are not related to reinsurance demand

post-SOX. The overall results of this study indicate that CEO turnovers have a significant

impact on the demand for reinsurance.

Our study stands out in several ways. First, we are the first to examine the impact of

CEO turnover on reinsurance demand after CEO turnover in the U.S. property casualty

insurance industry. Second, we also examine the impact of reinsurance demand on four CEO

turnover types (i.e., routine CEO, non-routine CEO, forced CEO and voluntary CEO). While

most previous literature focuses on large and publicly listed firms, we include mutual

insurers. To obtain turnover types for mutual insurers, we hand collect the data for major

CEO turnover types.

4

Third, no research has been done on reinsurance demand related to

CEO turnover in the context of organizational structure and the SOX Act. Our paper also

contributes more broadly as an organizational structure issue to analyze CEO turnover on

reinsurance policy.

The paper is organized as follows: Section 2 presents the hypothesis development. The

data and methodology are described in Section 3. Section 4 provides the summary statistics

and empirical results. Section 5 presents the conclusion.

2. Hypothesis Development

This section addresses the relation between reinsurance demand and CEO turnover. We

develop five hypotheses to examine the impact of CEO turnover on reinsurance demand.

2.1 CEO Turnover and Reinsurance Demand

Bebchuk, Cremers, and Peyer (2011) show that a CEO playing a dominant role in the

firm’s decision-making may lead to more conservative (i.e., risk averse) decisions because

he/she wants to protect his or her job.

5

Pathan (2009) suggests that CEOs who have more

power to influence board decisions are more likely to take on lower risk because managers

have un-diversifiable wealth, including human capital and a comparatively fixed salary. A

new CEO typically takes actions including a combination of operating, investing, and

4 In prior literature on the insurance industry, authors have focused on routine and non-routine CEO

turnover rather than forced and voluntary CEO turnover (e.g., He and Sommer, 2011; Cheng et al., 2017).

5 This paper notes that managers will avoid excessive risk taking to protect their positions.