Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  141 /342 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 141 /342 Next Page
Page Background

臺大管理論叢

27

卷第

2S

141

2. Contribution

This study continues the discussion on product quality hypothesis in terms of claim

service and proposes two contributions. First, we verify whether insurance brokers or agents

offer better claim service quality than the direct writer channel using claim data of Taiwan’s

voluntary auto third-party liability insurance. The results can compensate for the research

gap of past studies, which did not directly provide the evidence of claim service quality.

Second, the current study complements the prediction of Venezia et al. (1999) and the results

of Hsieh et al. (2014). The study also provides evidence for the phenomenon of the product

quality hypothesis and information asymmetry hypothesis coexisting in the insurance

market.

3. Data and Findings

This study obtained claim data of insured individuals on compulsory auto liability

insurance and voluntary auto third-party liability insurance from a large insurance company

in Taiwan. In total, 1,214 claim samples were used to verify whether insurance brokers or

agents outperformed the direct writer channel in terms of claim service in voluntary auto

third-party liability insurance. This study viewed claim amount and claim processing

efficiency as claim service variables. In considering the endogenous problem, which may

exist between claim service variables and marketing channels, we adopted a Hausman Test to

deal with the endogenous problem. Our results showed that in voluntary auto third-party

liability insurance claim cases from insurance brokers or agents, on average, each case was

NT$8,463 more than the direct writer channel in terms of claim amounts. These findings

propose that under the same degree of body injury, the claim amount coordinated by the

insurance broker or agent is significantly higher than that by the direct writer channel. This

result suggests that the insurance broker or agent outperformed the direct writer system in

earning higher claim amount for customers. The results also reveal that the capability of the

insurance broker or agent in earning a higher claim amount for customers rises further with

the increase in the degree of body injury of the victims. With respect to claim processing

efficiency, even if the injury degrees of injured persons were controlled, the study did not

find any evidence to support the view that insurance brokers or agents were better than the

direct writer channel in terms of claim service quality.