Page 114 - 34-1
P. 114

In-House Provision of Corporate Services: The Case of Property-Casualty Insurers and In-House Actuarial
               Loss Reserve Certification



               Stock Indicator and for External ActuaryPost SOX×Publicly-traded Stock Indicator for
               healthy insurers, under Hypothesis 3b.


               3.2.3 Specification of Other Independent Variables

                    We include independent variables to test the three principal hypotheses that exist
                                                      21
               in the literature concerning reserve errors.  These hypotheses relate to (1) taxes (Grace
               and Leverty, 2012; Nelson, 2000; Petroni, 1992), (2) income smoothing (Beaver et al.,

               2003; Grace and Leverty, 2012), and (3) rate regulation (Grace and Leverty, 2010; Nelson,
               2000). We also include other independent variables reflecting firm characteristics and
               economic variables as described below. In order to streamline the following discussions,
               we make no further distinction in the expectations for weak versus healthy insurers.
                    Overestimates of incurred losses understate total net income of the insurer and reduce


               its current income tax liability. So everything else held equal, the tax hypothesis is that

               firms will shelter income by overstating losses to reduce current taxes. Nelson (2000) and
               Petroni (1992), among others, use an indicator variable to capture this effect. The indicator

               variable is defined as one if the firm has a high tax rate (i.e., it pays positive income tax
               in the current year) and is set to zero otherwise. We expect this variable to have a positive
               coefficient in the regressions if insurers overstate losses to reduce current taxes.
                    Loss reserving errors also have been shown to be related to income smoothing. In
               years with high unbiased income, insurers are expected to over-reserve more (under-reserve

                     22
               less).  Conversely, in years with low unbiased income, insurers would be expected to
               under-reserve more (over-reserve less). We include a variable to capture effects of net
               income smoothing in the model, which is defined as the difference between unbiased

               net income in year t and reported net income in year t-1 divided by the absolute value of
               reported net income in year t-1 (Gaver and Paterson, 2014). That is, unbiased net income
               in the current year reflects net income without the loss reserving error; it is an estimate of
               actual net income. We expect this variable to be positively related to the loss reserve error.






                  21  The literature also contains hypotheses about weak insurers. We take this into account by estimating
                     separate regressions for weak versus healthy insurers.
                  22  Unbiased net income is net income gross of the reserve error. This variable is used in prior research
                     (e.g., Gaver and Paterson, 2014).


                                                     106
   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119