Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  206 /302 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 206 /302 Next Page
Page Background

分析台灣金控公司之關鍵風險因子:以風險平衡計分卡結合決策分析實驗室法為基礎之分析網路法

206

1. Introduction

Financial firms in Taiwan have recently been transformed into financial holding

companies (FHCs) through mergers and acquisitions and integration. Since the first FHC

was found in December 2001, the number of FHCs has been growing, reaching 16 in

2014. As the need for wealth management increases in Taiwan, stakeholders have focused

considerably on how FHCs systematically develop competitive policies to enhance their

competitiveness and risk management capabilities. Most of Taiwan’s FHCs assess risks

and evaluate capital requirements according to the New Basel Capital Accord (Basel II).

Risk management has become a crucial aspect in evaluating the overall operations of the

financial industry (McAllister and McManus, 1993; Hughes and Mester, 1993). Thus, risk

indicators have garnered substantial attention in the evaluation of various operational

decisions in the financial industry, including FHCs in Taiwan. The degree of risk affects

earnings volatility and operational risks. Therefore, the ultimate goal of risk management

is to assist FHCs in standardizing risk management and business implementation, as well

as in maximizing shareholder benefits. To decrease stock volatility, companies should

engage in corporate social responsibility activities (Chen, Shiu, and Chang, 2015).

Most previous studies have used the balanced scorecard (BSC) as an assessment tool

for evaluating business performance in the financial industry (Davis and Albright, 2004)

by focusing on financial indicators and business operations (Szilagyi, 1984; Maisel, 1992).

The purpose was to prevent the managers of a financial firm from hindering its evaluation

of its overall development plans effectively. In other words, the main indicators of the

BSC were financial indicators based on statistical approaches, and risk management

performance has not been considered in the evaluation results of the BSC, preventing

financial firms from planning their operational strategies on the basis of BSC results.

Unlike companies in other industries, FHCs tend to involve diverse and complex

operational risks, because their main trade instruments are currencies and credits. FHCs

must also address an increasing number of operational risks resulting from the emergence

of new financial products and services. Through the combination of the BSC and risk

management, risk factors should be integrated into the BSC to establish an operational

performance evaluation system of FHCs. Therefore, this study aimed to fill the research

gap by integrating risk management into the BSC, which would facilitate risk

management implementation rather than mere adherence to risk management policies.

Tseng, Yu, and Chiang (2011) proposed a combination of risk management with the

BSC (i.e., RM-BSC), which is an essential model that links performance strategy