Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  199 /302 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 199 /302 Next Page
Page Background

199

臺大管理論叢

28

卷第

2

3. Findings

This study explores the effects of the SCRU on corporate credit risk by employing

American bond data from 2000 to 2008. The empirical results reveal that CPSV is

significantly and positively related to bond yield spreads, whereas the KCICV exhibits

nonsignificant effects when other well-known bond yield determinant variables are

controlled for; these results indicate that a firm’s FCRU increases its credit risk, whereas

its FSRU has nonsignificant impacts. The results empirically support hypotheses 1 and 2.

This study also determines that business cycle conditions non-significantly change FCRU

effects on bond yield spreads. Moreover, the results we derive by evaluating SCRU

variables through other weighted methods or by controlling for additional variables

affecting cash flow variations are robust. Finally, the empirical results reveal that FCRU

plays a major role in determining corporate credit risk and bond yield spreads.

4. Research Limitations/Implications

This study has several limitations. First, we rely on the information disclosed in

“COMPUSTAT Industry Segment Files” to identify a firm’s suppliers and customers.

However, not all listed firms have complete information regarding their supply chain

counterparties. This is because public firms are required to disclose the identity of any

customer that contributes more than or equal to 10% of the firm’s revenues, according to

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 14 and 131. Therefore, our

sample firms are limited to those with complete customer or supplier information. Second,

there may be other more appropriate proxies for describing supply chain relationship

uncertainty than those used by this and previous studies.

5. Originality/Contribution

Most studies examine the firm characteristics of supply chain counterparties on the

basis of corporate credit risk, including internal liquidity risk (Chen, Liao, and Kuo,

2013), and information asymmetry (Chen, Liao, Kuo, and Hsieh, 2013). Few studies

directly address this problem from the SCRU perspective. Neither study considers the

SCRU effects in the estimation of supply chain counterparties’ characteristic risks. In

contrast to previous studies, we report the first investigation of the SCRU effects on

corporate credit risk, and this constitutes the major originality and contribution of this

study.