Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  95 /304 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 95 /304 Next Page
Page Background

95

臺大管理論叢

28

卷第

1

3. Empirical Methodology

3.1 Data Description and Variable Construction

Our study sample comprises of all firms listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange

(TWSE) and GreTai Securities Market (GTSM) which had, at some time between 2009

and 2012, received a corporate social responsibility award which was duly announced in

the Global Views or CommonWealth Magazines. Those firms that were in receipt of CSR

awards are defined in this study as ‘CSR winners’. We refer to Lee, Liu, and Yang (2011)

for our selection of the paired samples (non-CSR firms) since candidates for CSR awards

are not made public, and as such, we do not have access to lists of the firms that failed to

receive such awards.

In an attempt to reduce the potential error caused by the over-sampling of CSR

winners, robust firms were matched from the full sample of listed firms and the number of

matching samples was increased to 1:3, with the following criteria being applied:

12

(i)

firms in receipt of CSR awards must have had positive net margins over the past three

years; (ii) matching firms must be located in the same industry as the CSR winners; and

(iii) matching firms must have had total assets as close as possible to those of the CSR

winners in the one-year period prior to the CSR award announcements, with the difference

in assets being within 50%.

Any listed firms located in the financial sector were excluded from the sample since

the measures of financial performance in the financial sector differ from those of other

firms. The data descriptions are represented in Table 1, which shows the CSR award

announcement dates announced by the Global Views and CommonWealth Magazines

from 2009 to 2012. The exclusion process resulted in final samples of 157 CSR winners

and 498 non-CSR firms.

12 Another selection of the paired samples (with the incorporation of the industry, profit, size of assets

and P/B ratio) is examined in this study; the results were then compared as a robustness test. The

results using the new criteria (with the incorporation of the P/B ratio) are consistent with those using

our original criteria. We only present the results applying the original sample selection criterion due to

space consideration. The other results from the authors are available upon request.