Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  92 /304 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 92 /304 Next Page
Page Background

媒體聲譽對企業社會責任得獎企業其股市表現與財務績效之影響

92

Lins, Servaes, and Tamayo (2017) similarly examined CSR activities could mitigating the

impact of shareholder when the corporations suffers a negative shock.

It is generally believed that such positive outcomes are due to the marketing effect of

a firm’s CSR activities, which ultimately enhances both the awareness of the firm and its

brand image; however, diverse opinions are evident within the related literature. For

instance, the inclusion or deletion of a stock from the CSR index is measured in some of

the related studies as the means of capturing the level of corporate social performance,

where, on the one hand, Curran and Moran (2007) argued that no significant relationship

existed between the CSR proxy and CARs, whilst on the other hand, Becchetti, Ciciretti,

Hasan, and Kobeissi (2012) concluded that a significantly negative effect was readily

discernible on CARs as a result of announcements of stock deletions from the CSR index.

Clearly, despite the in-depth examinations of CSR, financial performance and stock

market performance in numerous prior studies, no general consensus has yet been reached.

Thus, in the present study, we investigate whether those firms in receipt of CSR awards

are found to have superior financial or stock market performance, particularly around

periods of award announcements, as compared to paired-sample firms. Thus, we set the

first of our hypotheses as follows:

Hypothesis 1: The stock returns and cumulative abnormal returns of CSR winners

will be higher than those of non-CSR firms.

Hypothesis 2: The financial performance of CSR winners will be superior to that of

non-CSR firms.

As noted in several of the related studies, a good corporate reputation can reduce the

agency problem and enhance a firm’s brand equity, ultimately improving firm value;

8

it is,

however, extremely difficult to effectively measure corporate reputation, as compared to,

say, tangible assets, and indeed, as noted earlier, both good and bad news can affect

corporate reputation (Wry et al., 2006).

Applying ‘media reputation’ as a proxy for firm reputation, Deephouse (2000) found

that it was indeed an intangible asset capable of boosting the firm’s competitive

advantage, ultimately leading to enhanced financial performance. Other studies have

8 See Gomes (2000), Brammer and Pavelin (2004), Eberl and Schwaiger (2005), Dowling (2006), and

Lai et al. (2010).