Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  198 /304 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 198 /304 Next Page
Page Background

投資機會和投資者保護機制對控股股東派息的影響

198

4.3 Additional Tests

We perform following additional tests to verify the documented results. First, the

documented results may be affected by potential economic or political changes across

years. To ensure that the results are free of such biases, we rerun the regressions with year

dummies. We also compute t-statistics that are adjusted for serial correlation using the

Newey and West (1987) procedure. The results remain the same.

If ownership structure, institutional factors, and dividend payouts across countries are

endogenously determined, then the inference from the ordinary least-squares models may

be misleading. To address this concern, we estimate a two-stage least squares (2SLS)

model using the legal origin and wealth of countries as instruments. The first-stage

regressions regress

Diverge

and each of the legal institutions (except

Legal

) on the

dummies for each type of legal origin (English, French, German, and Scandinavian) and a

country’s 10-year average per capita GDP before the test period, in accordance with the

work of Leuz et al. (2003). The 2SLS estimation procedures produce similar results.

7

The financial systems in Japan and Germany are more bank oriented than those of the

other countries (Moerland, 1995; Lehmann and Neuberger, 2001). To ensure that the

regression results are not influenced by the power of banks in determining the dividend

decisions of controlling shareholders, we exclude the observations from Japan and

Germany. The results, which are unreported, are similar.

Although a large control divergence creates an incentive for controlling shareholders

to expropriate, the possession of a high level of cash flow rights may reduce this incentive.

Thus, we exclude 898 observations (approximately 15% of the full sample) in which

Own

is greater than 50%. The results remain almost the same. We also exclude the observations

with the top 5% largest control divergence to ensure that our results are not affected by a

small group of firms with a particularly large control divergence, and the main results

remain unchanged.

7 One should interpret the 2SLS results with caution, because the validity of the results that are

generated depends on how successfully a country’s legal origin and wealth represent the right

instrumental variables in the model.