Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  234 /274 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 234 /274 Next Page
Page Background

會計穩健性:基於亞洲國家資料研究之回顧

234

We then summarize common empirical specifications of conservatism: Basu (1997),

Beaver and Ryan (2000), Givoly and Hayn (2000), Ball and Shivakumar (2005), Basu-multi-

period (Lin and Liu, 2014), and C-Score (Khan and Watts, 2009).

Prior literature investigates the effect of conservatism on attributes of earnings such as

earnings persistence or return on assets. Most studies find that conservatism does affect

earnings persistence (Chen et al., 2014). Lee and Hsieh (2015) further show that

conservatism affects earnings persistence in a nonlinear way.

3. Determinants and Consequences of Conservatism

Whether conservatism can improve efficiency depends on the information users and

decision scenario discussed. This section summarizes the determinants and consequences of

conservatism from three perspectives: the equity market, the debt market, and corporate

governance.

3.1 Equity Market Perspective

Brown et al. (2006) demonstrate that conservatism is positively related to value

relevance by using a cross-country sample. Furthermore, the relationship is more pronounced

when investor protection is stronger. Li (2015) finds that conservatism can reduce the cost of

equity capital. Barniv and Myring (2006) incorporate the effect of conservatism on earnings

into valuation models and show that the explanatory power improves. Chi and Wang (2010)

use C-Score as a proxy for conservatism and find that information asymmetry induces

demand for conservatism, which is similar to LaFond and Watts (2008). Lee and Liu (2014)

indicate that more conservative firms are more likely to finance through equity because

conservatism helps them reduce the information asymmetry between management and equity

investors.

Overall, most prior studies support that conservatism is beneficial for equity holders.

3.2 Debt Market Perspective

In Asian countries, public and private companies depend more on banks as a financing

source than US firms do. Some studies have utilized this feature to investigate the

association of lender type or debt type with borrower accounting conservatism.

Chen et al. (2010) find that the state ownership status of borrower or lender firms can

affect borrower conservatism for a sample of Chinese listed companies. Their empirical