Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  291 / 330 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 291 / 330 Next Page
Page Background

臺大管理論叢

27

卷第

2

291

4.3 Reconstructing the Construct Domain

Having based our analysis on Robinson and Bennett (1995) framework, we discovered

that some constructs of deviant workplace behavior proposed after 1995 were absent from

their model. We included these new constructs in our study, such as abusive supervision,

incivility, and bullying. We suggest that the construct domain of deviant workplace behavior

should be reconstructed to include newly developed concepts.

4.4 Integration of Constructive Deviance Perspective

Based on Robinson and Bennett (1995) definition, deviant workplace behavior is

negative in nature. However, Warren (2003) challenged this definition, proposing that

employees’ deviations from organizational norms and regulations may include behaviors that

are constructive to organizations. For example, whistle-blowing is generally considered to be

a positive deviance. In other words, we should examine in the future what criteria should be

used to define a person’s “deviance”. Since organizations may have multiple stakeholders, it

may be that the same behavior is negative for one stakeholder but positive for another one.

We suggest that both positive and negative behavior should be incorporated into the overall

workplace deviance model.

4.5 Study Limitation

This study examined 81 empirical articles on deviant workplace behavior published in

the TSSCI list and in 15 high-quality Western journals. We believe that the recent emergence

of the Chinese economy has increased interest in Chinese organizational behavior and in

employees’ deviant behavior in Chinese contexts. Our study results can provide references

for scholars who wish to examine organizational phenomena in Asia generally and in greater

China specifically.