Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  86 / 322 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 86 / 322 Next Page
Page Background

營運資金管理與裁決性應計數之估計

86

Consequently, the accruals of the company decrease. Since Jones-type models cannot control

for this effect, the estimated discretionary accruals are overestimated (underestimated) in

companies that increase (decrease) working capital. Moreover, a high degree of working

capital management causes a severely-biased estimate.

This study investigated the effect of working capital management on discretionary

accruals, which were estimated using Jones-type models. In addition to testing the empirical

models and performing simulation procedures with the entire sample, this study analyzed

particular samples, such as companies that increase capital (seasoned equity offering) and

companies that reduce capital (for settling accumulated losses). First of all, previous studies

have indicated that companies that increase capital might manipulate earnings through

accruals to increase stock offering price and to reduce the cost of capital (Teoh et al., 1998b;

Kim and Park, 2005). However, when companies increase capital based on corporate growth

(Kim and Weisbach, 2008), they expand their working capital. Using Jones-type models to

estimate accruals may overestimate discretionary accruals, causing incorrect empirical

results of inferring upward earnings manipulation. Secondly, when companies incur

substantial losses, management might resort to actions such as writing off accumulated losses

by reducing capital and optimizing the financial structure by adjusting working capital. If the

effect of reducing the working capital of companies with capital reduction is not reflected in

the revenue, Jones-type models may cause discretionary accruals to be underestimated; thus,

the empirical results would support the hypothesis that companies that reduce capital tend to

manipulate earnings downward.

2. Methodology

Based on the discussion in the previous section, we developed the following hypotheses

to examine the phenomenon of potential estimation bias in the discretionary accruals caused

by using Jones-type models:

H1: A high degree of working capital management causes a severe estimation bias in

the discretionary accruals caused by using Jones-type models.

H2: Compared with other firms, seasoned equity offering firms that increase

investment in working capital yield larger discretionary accruals.

H3: Compared with other firms, firms that reduce capital (to settle accumulated losses)

and reduce investment in working capital yield fewer discretionary accruals.