Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  326 / 372 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 326 / 372 Next Page
Page Background

服務體驗管理:亞洲文獻回顧與未來研究方向

326

2.6 Service Failure/Recovery

Although offering error-free services is the ultimate goal for most service firms, service

failure is difficult to avoid because of increased interactions between service firms and

customers (Kelley and Davis, 1994; Kelley et al., 1993; Patterson et al., 2006). Effective

service recovery has been found to have a significant impact on customer judgment of

service providers and the overall service experience (McCollough et al., 2000). Despite a

growing body of literature on service failure and recovery (Babakus et al., 2003; Bitner et al.,

1990; Kelley and Davis, 1994), several areas for future research still require further

investigations. For example, while past research mainly adopted experimental design to

manipulate service failures, future studies can explore service failure issues from real cases

and situations. In addition, as SST failures happen frequently in service experiences, issues

such as how customers respond to SSTs failures, what constitutes a successful SST recovery,

and the different roles of employees and customers in the recovery process should be further

explored. Additional research is also needed in examining the impact of multiple service

failures on service experiences.

2.7 Customer Loyalty Management

As market competition intensifies with diminishing customer loyalty, firms are

exploring ways to increase customer retention (Reichheld and Teal, 2001). Researchers and

practitioners have identified relationship quality and switching barriers as determinants of

customer loyalty. A favorable perception of relationship quality leads to higher customer

loyalty (Hennig-Thurau et al., 2002), while switching barriers serve as a mean of locking in

customers (Colgate et al., 2007; Jones et al., 2000; Patterson and Smith, 2003; Wang, 2010).

Although there is a consensus that relationship quality is a multi-dimensional construct, past

studies have not reached an agreement on its sub-dimensions, which requires future

investigations. Future research should also investigate the roles individual differences and

culture variables play between relationship quality and customer loyalty. Furthermore,

another area for future research is to examine how individual differences affect the switching

barriers-customer retention relationships in different service contexts.