Page 40 - 35-2
P. 40

The Bias Assimilation Effect and Attitude Polarization in AIoT Smart Healthcare Word-of-Mouth
               Communication



               polarization, whereas misalignment may intensify it.
                    Research shows that younger consumers are more open to new technologies and
               that elder adults are more hesitant (Venkatesh and Davis, 1996; Mohamad, Musa, Razak,
               Ganapathy, and Mansor, 2021; Rupp, Michaelis, McConnell, and Smither, 2018); however,

               elder adults may adopt a new technology if they perceive it to be useful (Kim and
               Choudhury, 2020; Venkatesh, Morris, Davis, and Davis, 2003). Few assimilation studies
               have compared age groups; thus, whether the effect of WOM regarding AIoT brands and

               health technologies differ between age groups remains unclear.
                    This study focuses on examining how attitude consistency influences the attitude
               polarization of recipients through credibility. Furthermore, it explores the moderating
               effect of attitude consistency regarding medical brands and investigates age differences
               in the hypothesized effects. The study fills a gap in the literature by investigating

               intergenerational differences in assimilation effects and offering targeted recommendations.


                                              2. Methodology



                    Using biased assimilation theory, this study conducts a quasiexperiment with a 2
               (valence of eWOM on AIoT smart medical technology: positive vs. negative) × 2 (valence
               of eWOM on medical brands: positive vs. negative) × 2 (two versions of the same
               message) design.



                                                 3. Findings


                    Results from a sample of 1,010 respondents demonstrate that greater consistency

               leads to higher credibility. Consumers rely on online reviews to decide whether to adopt
               an AIoT health device, such as a smartwatch with heart-rate monitoring. Reviews differ
               in their effects depending on the recipient’s existing attitudes—a phenomenon known
               as assimilation bias. This study examines how attitude consistency toward AIoT health

               technology and the review’s stance affect persuasiveness and attitude polarization, whether
               consistency with the medical provider’s brand moderates this process, and how these
               dynamics differ by age.
                    This study finds that attitude consistency toward AIoT health technology is positively



                                                      32
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45