臺大管理論叢
第
27
卷第
2S
期
315
參考文獻
日本保險研究所,
2001-2012
,
日本損害保險統計號
。
(Insurance Research Institute.
2001-2012.
The statistics of Japanese non-life insurance business
.)
,
2014
,
日本損害保險統計號
。
(Insurance Research Institute. 2014.
The statistics
of Japanese non-life insurance business
.)
王儷玲、彭金隆與張義宏,
2006
,我國壽險業銀行保險業務參與度與經營效率分析,
臺大管理論叢
,
17
卷
1
期:
59-90
。
doi: 10.6226/NTURM2006.17.1.59 (Wang,
Jennifer Li-Ling, Peng, Jin-Lung, and Chang, Yi-Huang. 2006. The impact of
Bancassurance on the efficiency performance of life insurance companies in
Taiwan.
NTU Management Review
, 17 (1): 59-90. doi: 10.6226/NTURM2006.
17.1.59)
張簡永章,
2012
,中國產險公司產品多角化與經營績效,
保險專刊
,
28
卷
1
期:
27-59
。
(Chang-Chien, Iung-Jang. 2012. Product diversification and financial
performance: Evidence from Chinese property-liability insurers.
Taiwan
Insurance Review
, 28 (1): 27-59.)
張簡永章、吳明哲與王惠正,
2011
,中國壽險公司產品多角化與經營績效,
保險專刊
,
27
卷
1
期:
37-66
。
(Chang-Chien, Iung-Jang, Wu, Ming-Che, and Wang, Hui-
Cheng. 2011. Product diversification and financial performance: Evidence from
Chinese life insurers.
Taiwan Insurance Review
, 27 (1): 37-66.)
劉景中,
2011
,銀行集中度及效率對市場競爭度的影響:台灣實證研究,
經濟論文叢
刊
,
39
卷
1
期:
115-173
。
doi: 10.6277/ter.2011.391.4 (Liu, Jin-Chung. 2011.
The impact of bank concentration and efficiency on competition: Evidence from
Taiwan.
Taiwan Economic Review
, 39 (1): 115-173. doi: 10.6277/ter.2011.391.4)
賴丞坡與薛立言,
2004
,
產險業「結構-行為-績效」之再檢視-以台灣產險業為例
,
海峽兩岸科學技術研討會暨大學院系長論壇,上海,中國。
(Lai, Chen-Po,
and Xue, Li-Yan. 2004.
The reexamination of structure-conduct-performance:
The example of property-liability insurance industry in Taiwan
. Paper presented
at the Scientific and Technology Conference Forum, Shanghai, China.)
Alhassan, A. L., and Biekpe, N. 2015. Efficiency, productivity and returns to scale
economies in the non-life insurance market in South Africa.
The Geneva Papers
on Risk and Insurance–Issues and Practice
, 40 (3): 493-515. doi: 10.1057/gpp.
2014.37
Bain, J. S. 1951. Relation of profit rate to industry concentration: American manufacturing,
1936-1940.
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
, 65 (3): 293-324. doi: 10.2307/
1882217