Page 7 - 34-3
P. 7

(Heckman, 1979), they discover that the association between investment performance in
               China and divestiture decisions exhibit an inverted U-shaped pattern when investment
               performance in China is favorable. Nonetheless, these companies are less likely to divest
               from China when the investment performance becomes poor. They also uncover a positive
               association between divestiture decisions and market performance. Finally, they reveal the
               Inverse Mill’s Ratio and decision incompatibility both approach significance and success-
               fully control selection bias.
                   The second article titled “Do Tax Risk and Tax Avoidance Affect Firm Value?” in the
               field of finance by Kuo, Ko, Wu, and Ho looks at the impact of tax risk and tax avoidance,
               both individually and jointly, on firm value. Using the data of listed companies in Taiwan
               from 2000-2019, the results of measuring tax avoidance and tax risk with the cash effec-
               tive tax rate show that investors negatively value tax risk while positively value tax avoid-
               ance; furthermore, tax risk moderates the positive valuation of tax avoidance. Additionally,
               they discover that across different tax systems or tax rate periods, tax avoidance and tax
               risk have roughly the same impact on firm value; nonetheless, the magnitude of the impact
               varies in some periods. Altogether, while prior literature on firm value has mostly focused
               on tax avoidance, the empirical results of this study show that future researchers should
               also consider the interaction between tax risk and tax avoidance.
                   The third article titled “A Humanistic Innovation Business Model for Higher
               Education: The Case Study of Coursera” by Chiu, Wu, and Chuang is a case study on
               digital transformation and value creation. The study traces the development of Coursera
               (2012-2022) and analyzes how Coursera fosters the emergence of a new ecosystem
               through the perspectives of ecosystem and institutional theory. This study finds that as a
               hub firm, Coursera functions as an ecosystem architect and advocates for “educational
               equity,” gaining legitimacy and support from elite universities. Specifically, this study
               proposes a process model illustrates how Coursera connects and orchestrates ecosystem
               members; designs the content, structure and governance models of new activities; and
               fosters a dual-flywheel ecosystem business model centered on humanistic innovation,
               which promotes the generating of a new ecosystem. This study proves that Coursera
               provides a notable example which is distinct from traditional technology innovation
               ecosystems.
                   The fourth article titled “Logical Correspondences: Lessons from the Digital
               Transformation Case Study via Institutional Logic Perspective” by Chen is also a case
               study on digital transformation and value creation. The research aims to explore the shift
   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12