Page 37 - 34-1
P. 37

NTU Management Review Vol. 34 No. 1 Apr. 2024




                  Table 9  The GB Parameters of Each Numerical Example with Market Data
                 Terms      GB1        GB2         GB3         GB4         GB5         GB6
                Stock ID  [2330, 2882]  [2603, 2882]  [2330, 2603]   [2330, 2603, 2882]
                 S i  (0)  [505, 44.55]  [88.3, 44.55]  [505, 88.3]   [505, 88.3, 44.55]
                        [0.274, 0.241] [0.658, 0.241] [0.274, 0.658]  [0.274, 0.658, 0.241]
                  σ i
                           [1, 1]      [1, 1]      [1, -1]    [1, 1, 1]  [1, -1, 1]  [1, -1, -1]
                  α i
                        [0.021, 0.048] [0.035, 0.048] [0.021, 0.035]  [0.021, 0.035, 0.048]
                  q i
                         ρ 1,2  = 0.451  ρ 1,2  = 0.340  ρ 1,2  = 0.171  ρ 1,2  = 0.171, ρ 1,3  = 0.451, ρ 2,3  = 0.340,
                  ρ i,j
                  K        549.55     132.85       593.3      637.85      461.25      372.15
               Note:  The notations are defined as follows: S i  (0): the initial asset price; σ i : volatility; α i : units of the
                    ith asset; q i : dividend yield rate; ρ i,j : correlation coefficient between S i  and S j ; K: strike price.
                    The time to maturity, T, is assumed to be 1. The risk-free interest rate, r, is assumed to be
                    0.015.


                  Table 10  The GB Parameters of Each Numerical Example with Market Data
                Methods     GB1        GB2         GB3         GB4         GB5         GB6
                 USD       54.094     22.445      54.584      61.910      55.368      54.086
                 SLN       54.155     23.540      55.977      62.246      56.615      55.631
                  MC       54.077     22.487      54.543      62.122      55.327      54.079
                  se       0.213       0.114       0.207       0.247       0.212       0.204
               Note:  This table presents the pricing results of various GB options computed by three different
                    approaches: USD represents the pricing model proposed in this article, SLN represents
                    the pricing model presented in Borovkova et al. (2007), and MC denotes the Monte Carlo
                    simulation method. The standard error of Monte Carlo simulation is denoted by se.

               simplicity, we assume that both basket and spread options are composed of two assets, and
               their parameters are given in the footnotes of Figures 4, 5, and 6.

                   Figure 6 provides numerical examples, which show the Greeks of an option portfolio
               composed of a long position in a basket option on GB7 and a short position in a spread
               option on GB8 with the same parameters defined in the footnotes of Figures 4 and 5.

               Notably, the patterns of the Greeks of the option portfolio are totally different from those
               of a single basket or spread option, and are not easily understood simply via economic
               intuitions. This fact reveals the importance of our pricing model for integrating the Greek
               risks of both options, which enhances hedging efficiency and reduces the cost for hedging
               option portfolios.












                                                     29
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42