Page 113 - 33-2
P. 113

NTU Management Review Vol. 33 No. 2 Aug. 2023




                    Table 2 Means, Standard Deviations, and Correlations among Variables
                                                             Correlation
                      Variables
                                        1     2      3     4      5     6      7     8     9
               1. Innovation Performance  -
                                       .30
               2. Innovation Intention        .83 1
                                       (.06) 2
                                       .17    .44
               3. Value Congruence                  .70
                                       (.05)  (.05)
                                       .12    .44   .53
               4. Felt Obligation      (.06)  (.06)  (.05)  .76
                                       .29    .51   .55    .58
               5. EML                                            .80
                                       (.05)  (.05)  (.05)  (.06)
                                       .00    .18   .59    .43   .56
               6. TMX                                                   .81
                                       (.05)  (.05)  (.05)  (.05)  (.05)
                                       .06    .03  -.07   -.04  -.08   -.03
               7. Education Level      (.06)  (.05)  (.05)  (.06)  (.05)  (.05)  -
                                       .29    .12   .17    .14   .22   -.05  -.13
               8. Age                                                                -
                                       (.06)  (.05)  (.05)  (.06)  (.05)  (.05)  (.06)
                                       .31    .19   .16    .18   .29    .03  -.30    .51
               9. Company Tenure                                                           -
                                       (.06)  (.05)  (.05)  (.06)  (.05)  (.05)  (.06)  (.07)
               Mean                    -     5.15  4.30   4.77  5.24   5.64  4.06   4.01  3.88
               Standard Deviation      -      .98  1.24   1.32  1.24   1.11   .69   1.43  3.25
               Note:  1. Diagonal elements are square roots of AVE.
                    2. Standard errors in parentheses.

               innovation intention (β = .32, p < .001). H2 and H4 are also supported. Finally, H5 posits
               that innovation intention is positively linked to employees’ innovation performance. Our
               results support this hypothesis (β = .23, p < .001).


               4.3 Tests of the Effects of the Mediating Mechanism
                   To better understand the direct and indirect effects of the relationships among the
               mediating variables in our research model, we decompose the effects of the mediating
               mechanism. As depicted in Model 2, we test a direct effect of value congruence on
               employees’ innovation performance by putting one direct path from value congruence
               to innovation performance. We obtain an adequate fit to the data from this model, but

               the value is not significantly better than the baseline model (i.e., the model as pictured in
                          2
               Figure 1) (∆χ  [1] = .13, n.s.). For the model tests and their fit indexes, see Table 3.
                   As the difference is not significant, we conclude that the direct path from value
               congruence to innovation performance is insignificant; therefore, innovation intention
               fully mediates the effect of value congruence on innovation performance. Similarly, we


                                                     105
   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118