Page 110 - 33-2
P. 110

Service Innovation in the IT Service Industry: Social Influence and Relationship Exchange Perspectives




               innovative ideas to deal with team tasks. We used four items based on Zhang and Bartol
               (2010) to measure EML. We asked respondents about the extent to which they perceived
               individual empowerment based on the four dimensions of leadership: (1) enhancing the
               meaningfulness of work; (2) fostering participation in decision making; (3) expressing
               confidence in high performance; and (4) providing autonomy by removing hindrances. To
               measure TMX, we used four items developed by Seers (1989). We asked respondents to
               rate the strength of TMX with their team.

                    To account for potential influences on individual innovation performance, we
               controlled for employees’ education level, company tenure, and age. For example,
               employees with advanced degrees may exhibit a wider array of ideas at work, those
               with longer tenures at the same company may be more adept at generating novel ideas
               (Zhang and Bartol, 2010), and older employees may bring a wealth of work- and life-
               related experiences that could be advantageous in their tasks (Scott and Bruce, 1994).
               Education level was categorized as follows: middle school or below, senior high school,

               junior college, university, and postgraduate studies. Company tenure was measured by the
               number of months an employee had worked at the company.


                                           4. Research Analysis


                    According to the two-step approach of Anderson and Gerbing (1988), we perform

               both measurement model evaluation and structural model evaluation. We first assess the
               measurement properties of the latent constructs by running a Confirmatory Factor Analysis
               (CFA); we then test all hypotheses of the conceptual model by conducting a structural
               equation analysis.
                    We use LISREL 8.80 to run our research models, and evaluate the goodness-of-fit
               of the models using chi-square tests, the Non-normed Fit Index (NNFI), the Root Mean
               Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA), and the Comparative Fit Index (CFI). The

               results also show good model fit, requiring nonsignificant chi-square tests, the values of
               RMSEA less than or equal to .08, and the values of NNFI and CFI greater than or equal to
                                                                        2
               .90 (Bagozzi and Yi, 1988). The present study also conducts χ -difference tests to verify
               the effects of mediation and moderation.


               4.1 Construct Validity
                    We adopt LISREL 8.80 to perform a CFA and determine the validity and reliability


                                                     102
   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115