Page 45 - 臺大管理論叢第32卷第2期
P. 45
NTU Management Review Vol. 32 No. 2 Aug. 2022
and Social Psychology, 84 (3): 632-643. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-
3514.84.3.632
Hobfoll, S. E., and Lilly, R. S. 1993. Resource conservation as a strategy for community
psychology. Journal of Community Psychology, 21 (2): 128-148. https://doi.
org/10.1002/1520-6629(199304)21:2<128::AID-JCOP2290210206>3.0.CO;2-5
Innanen, H., Tolvanen, A., and Salmela-Aro, K. 2014. Burnout, work engagement
and workaholism among highly educated employees: Profiles, antecedents
and outcomes. Burnout Research, 1 (1): 38-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.burn.2014.04.001
James, L. R. 1982. Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal
of Applied Psychology, 67 (2): 219-229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-
9010.67.2.219
Johnstone, A., and Johnston, L. 2005. The relationship between organizational climate,
occupational type and workaholism. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 34 (3):
181-188.
Junker, N. M., Kaluza, A. J., Häusser, J. A., Mojzisch, A., van Dick, R., Knoll, M.,
and Demerouti, E. 2021. Is work engagement exhausting? The longitudinal
relationship between work engagement and exhaustion using latent growth
modeling. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 70 (2): 788-815.
https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12252
Kahn, W. A. 1990. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement
at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33 (4): 692-724. https://doi.
org/10.5465/256287
Kanai, A., Wakabayashi, M., and Fling, S. 1996. Workaholism among employees in
Japanese corporations: An examination based on the Japanese version of
the workaholism scales. Japanese Psychological Research, 38 (4): 192-203.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5884.1996.tb00024.x
Kaplan, S. 1995. The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative
framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15 (3): 169-182. https://doi.
org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2
Landis, R. S., Beal, D. J., and Tesluk, P. E. 2000. A comparison of approaches to forming
composite measures in structural equation models. Organizational Research
Methods, 3 (2): 186-207. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810032003
37