Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  263 /302 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 263 /302 Next Page
Page Background

263

臺大管理論叢

28

卷第

2

Table 3 through Table 5 shows the empirical results of the overall effect of customer

concentration on cost stickiness. Estimates of three different variables of costs, which are

SGA, COGS

, and

OC

, are shown in Table 3 through Table 5 with three specifications,

respectively. SG&A costs are most commonly used in the literature on cost stickiness

since the seminal paper, Anderson et al. (2003). We report the results in Table 3.

First, Column (1) of Table 3 reports the baseline model derived from Anderson et al.

(2003) with the modification that my variable of interest

CC

is incorporated. Specifically,

the coefficient on ∆

ln(Sale)

is 0.57971 (

t

-statistic = 112.28), positively significant at the

0.1% level, which is consistent with prior literature that change in SG&A costs are

positively associated with change in sales revenue. The estimated coefficient, 0.57971

indicates that SG&A costs increase 0.57 % per 1% increase in sales revenue. The

coefficient on ∆ln

(Sale)*Dec

is -0.16276 (

t

-statistic = -15.20), significantly negative at the

0.1% level, which is consistent with the results in Anderson et al. (2003) that provides

strong support for cost stickiness. The combined value of these two coefficients on

∆ln

(Sale)

and ∆ln

(Sale)*Dec

is 0.41695, indicating that SG&A costs decreases only

0.417% per 1% decrease in sales revenue. The fact that both the coefficient on ∆ln

(Sale)

and the combined value of the two coefficients are both significantly less than one,

indicating that SG&A costs are not closely proportional to changes in sales revenue.

Selling, general and administrative expenses (

SG&A

) is the primary non-production cost

presented in the income statement. When customer concentration (

CC

) is incorporated in

the model, the coefficient on our variable of interest,

CC*∆ln(Sale)*Dec

, is 0.17843

(

t

-statistic = 5.07), significantly positive at the 0.1% level. The result indicates that for

companies with more concentrated customers, SG&A costs are less sticky when sales

decrease.