Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  213 /302 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 213 /302 Next Page
Page Background

213

臺大管理論叢

28

卷第

2

independent supervisory authorities can prevent the increase in risk behaviors. Agoraki,

Delis, and Pasiouras (2011) obtained similar results. Barakat, Chernobai, and Wahrenburg

(2014) identified information asymmetry in operational risk announcements, which can be

reduced through stronger governance structures of financial firms. Their empirical

findings also revealed that liquidity improves with an increase in quoted depth, which is

negatively associated with information asymmetry. Their results support previous findings

reported in studies encouraging stronger governance for reducing operational risk in

financial firms (Chernobai, Jorion, and Yu, 2011; Wang and Hsu, 2013).

Substantial evidence is also available pertaining to bank holding companies (BHCs),

a subset of financial holding companies focusing on their control over banks. For

example, Demsetz and Strahan (1997) found that improved diversification of larger BHCs

does not necessarily lead to overall risk reduction, whereas asset growth does. Hirtle

(2016) found that greater public disclosure was associated with more efficient risk-taking

and higher risk-adjusted performance at BHCs. Curry, Fissel, and Hanweck (2008)

indicated that adopting Basel II for financial transparency facilitates improving market

discipline and predictions of bank risk, and reduces instances of bank risk-taking. Ellul

and Yerramilli (2013) found that strong and independent risk management functions (i.e.,

the combination of Chief Risk Officer (CRO) Present, CRO Executive, CRO-Top5, CRO

Centrality, risk committee experience, and active risk) can maintain improved

performance at BHCs during the 2007–2008 crisis period. Buston (2016) reported that the

likelihood of BHC insolvency was lower for BHCs actively practicing risk management

during the same period. By contrast, although banks are recommended to have

independent directors who are financial experts, the risk-taking activities of such directors

were associated with the underperformance of larger banks at commercial BHCs during

the crisis years (Minton, Taillard, and Williamson, 2014).

It can easily be verified that the risk indicators of the RM-BSC align with Basel II

and common risk factors for banks and FHCs such as credit risk (BCBS, 2006), legal risk

(Chavez-Demoulin, Embrechts, and Nešlehová, 2006), integration risk (Amihud and Lev,

1981; Ross, Westerfield, Jaffe, and Roberts, 2002), reputational risk (BCBS, 2006),

liquidity risk (Barakat et al., 2014), information risk (Hirtle, 2016), transactional risk or

market risk (BCBS, 2006), operational risk (BCBS, 2006), competitive risk (Kim and

Santomero, 1988; Boyd and De Nicoló, 2005), transition risk (Longstaff, Mithal, and

Neis, 2005), management risk (Ellul and Yerramilli, 2013; Buston, 2016), and leadership

risk (Minton et al., 2014). Risk factors exhibit relationships such as a positive correlation