Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  269 /304 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 269 /304 Next Page
Page Background

269

臺大管理論叢

28

卷第

1

4. Results

4.1 Descriptive Statistics

The descriptive statistics for all variables used in this study are presented in Table 3.

We further divide the sample into two categories: restatement and non-restatement

samples, which denote companies with deficient internal controls and companies with

effective internal controls, respectively. As would be expected, restatement companies are

less likely to conclude that their internal controls are effective, relative to non-restatement

companies (84.8 percent versus 98 percent, respectively). The two groups are similar in

PE ratios, restructuring charges, and the incidence of FT. On average, restatement

companies are smaller in size and market capitalization, have poorer ROA, are more likely

to report aggregate loss, use less leverage, and have lower MB ratios compared with their

non-restatement counterparts. Additionally, restatement companies are more likely than

non-restatement companies are to appoint Big-4 auditors.

9

9 Compared with non-accelerated filers, large-sized accelerated filers are more likely to appoint Big-4

auditors. Because our sample covers only accelerated filers, we should be very cautious to infer that

large auditors provide lower audit quality.