Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  14 /304 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 14 /304 Next Page
Page Background

公司避稅與金字塔結構

14

To address the concern, we employ the cash effective tax rate (

CASH_ETR

) as the

second measure of tax avoidance. Following Dyreng et al. (2008, 2010), we define

CASH_ETR

as cash taxes paid divided by pre-tax accounting income in year t. Unlike

GAAP_ETR

,

CASH_ETR

is not biased by changes in tax accounting accruals.

CASH_ETR

reflects avoidance activities that directly affect net income (i.e., permanent book-tax

differences) as well as those that defer income taxes to the later periods (i.e., temporary

book-tax differences). Consistent with prior research, lower values of

CASH_ETR

represent higher levels of tax avoidance (Dyreng et al., 2008, 2010).

One potential issue of the annual

CASH_ETR

can arise from the mismatch between

the timing of cash payment to tax authorities and when the tax is incurred. Cash taxes paid

represent the actual taxes paid by the firm during a given year and could include estimated

tax payments associated with the prior year’s income. In addition, to avoid year-to-year

volatility in annual

CASH_ETR

, our third (fourth) measure of tax avoidance is the long-

term cash effective tax rate following Dyreng et al. (2008). Specifically, we define

LT_

ETR_3Y

(

LT_ETR_5Y

) as the sum of the cash taxes paid over the current year t and the

preceding two (four) years divided by pre-tax accounting income summed over the

corresponding three-year (five-year) period. Prior research suggests that lower values of

LT_ETR_3Y

(

LT_ETR_5Y

) reflect higher levels of tax avoidance (e.g., Gupta and

Newberry, 1997; Rego, 2003; Dyreng et al., 2008).

3.3 Research Design

To examine the association between tax avoidance and the number of layers, the

following empirical model is employed using ordinary least squares (OLS):

AVOID

i,t

=

β

0

+

β

1

LAYER

i,t

+

β

2

SIZE

i,t

+

β

3

MB

i,t

+

β

4

LEV

i,t

+

β

5

ROA

i,t

+

β

6

NOL

i,t

+

β

7

Δ

NOI

i,t

+

β

8

STD_ROA

i,t

+

β

9

Δ

SALES

i,t

+

β

10

CASH

i,t

+

β

11

INTAN

i,t

(1)

+

β

12

RD

i,t

+

β

13

PPE

i,t

+

β

14

ADV

i,t

+

β

15

SGA

i,t

+

β

16

ln

(

NUM_INVESTEE

)

i,t

+

YEARdummy

+

INDUSTRYdummy

+

ε

i,t

Where

AVOID

i,t

is the tax avoidance as measured with

GAAP_ETR

,

CASH_ETR

,

LT_

ETR_3Y

, and

LT_ETR_5Y

.

LAYER

i,t

is the number of layers of the longest investment

chain in firm’s pyramidal structure for firm

i

in period

t

. We take the natural log of

LAYER

i,t

to avoid the non-linearity issue;

SIZE

i,t

the firm size for firm i, year t, measured as

natural log of total assets in year t; market to book ratio

MB

i,t

, measured as the market