Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  12 /304 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 12 /304 Next Page
Page Background

公司避稅與金字塔結構

12

Dharmapala and Hines, 2009). A tax haven in which certain taxes are levied at an

extremely lower rate or even zero attracts corporate entities to establish subsidiaries to

avoid taxes by permitting firms to shift the domestic income away from high-tax

jurisdictions to the tax havens (e.g., see Hines and Rice, 1994 and Grubert and Slemrod,

1998). It is very common to find giant businesses like Boeing, General Electric, Pfizer,

Microsoft, and Google using tax havens to dramatically lower their taxes often to zero.

Angel Gurría, current secretary general of the OECD, called for the need of G20

combating tax avoidance of shifting profits to offshore tax havens (Inman, 2013).

We argue that as the number of layers increases, the obscure nature of tax avoidance

can increase, which makes it easier to conduct intercompany transactions to avoid tax and

make it difficult to be detected by the government. For example, in 2010, it was reported

that Google reduced its overseas tax rate to 2.4% by moving most of its foreign profits

from Ireland to Netherlands and then to Bermuda (Drucker, 2010). The use of three layers

for foreign subsidiaries in Europe is claimed to help Google Inc. to avoid taxes overseas

(Kleinbard, 2011). Thus, we expect the positive association between tax avoidance

activities and having subsidiaries in tax havens can increase with the number of layers. We

form our hypothesis as follows.

H2: Ceteris paribus, the positive association between tax avoidance activities and the

number of layers becomes more pronounced as firms have more investees in tax

haven countries.

3. Research Design

3.1 The Number of Investment Layers

All listed companies in Taiwan are required to disclose information on all of their

affiliated enterprises according to “

Criteria Governing Preparation of Affiliation Reports,

Consolidated Business Reports and Consolidated Financial Statements of Affiliation

Enterprises

” (hereafter CGPAR). This allows us to calculate the number of layers based

on publicly available affiliation information. As firms in many countries are not required

to disclose the structure of corporate pyramids in many countries, such mandatory

disclosures in Taiwan provide a natural choice to test our research questions.

Take Figure 1 as an example. Our firm of interest is Far Eastern Department Stores

on layer 0 because it is the listed firm (or the parent firm). The successive layers of

affiliates below the parent firm are used for calculating the number of layers of the

corporate pyramid. Companies located at layer 1 to layer 5 are all Far Easter Department