Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  281 / 322 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 281 / 322 Next Page
Page Background

臺大管理論叢

26

卷第

3

281

“organizational field” inspired by Bourdieu) would definitely need to achieve isomorphism

because they must collectively conform or submit to the institution; no variances would be

allowed and must be institutionalized. That is why so many organizational forms in a context

look alike. Furthermore, such notions as technological regime, dominant innovation, and

standard design argue that all firms must follow the rules of the game set by the regime;

otherwise, they will be eliminated by the market. Last but not least, Chaos Theory is

included in the domain of determinism because it describes a peculiar phenomenon in which

a small event unexpectedly becomes extraordinarily big; in other words, voluntarism creates

its own determinism, eventually shaping the actors’ futures.

Other than voluntarism and determinism, scholars have recently endorsed an

interactionist perspective, indicating the reciprocal relationship between structure and social

agent. That is to say, structure is not only constraining but also enabling the social agent.

Social agents initially comply with the institution, and then they utilize social skills such as

strategic framing to challenge it (i.e., deinstitutionalization) and to construct a new landscape

(i.e., institutionalization). Under such a framework, the structure and agent indeed interact in

a reciprocal and dynamic manner. For example, institutional entrepreneurship has been

widely used in many empirical studies of technological change, emerging markets, and

organizational change. Besides, strategy-as-practice (SAP) or strategizing emphasize the

deinstitutionalization that results from the micro-behaviors of managers (i.e., practice).

As a meta-analysis, we review articles - mainly empirical studies - drawn from eight

leading management journals in Taiwan:

Chiao Da Management Review, Sun Yat-Sen

Management Review, Journal of Technology Management, Management Review, Journal of

Management & Systems, Journal of Management, NTU Management Review

, and

Organization and Management

, because their scopes are more based on general

management. The quality of their peer-to-peer review processes is high enough for them to

merit inclusion in the Taiwan Social Science Citation Index (TSSCI). The data collection

process is tripartite. First, all published articles from 2000 through 2014 were collected;

these amounted to 2,440 articles. Second, we chose articles that were directly relevant to the

domain of the AOM’s TIM Division or ENT Division; in this case, we repeatedly checked

the titles/subtitles, keywords, and the affiliate(s) of author(s). Third, articles unlikely to be

submitted to the AOM’s TIM Division and ENT Division were excluded even though their

research targets are in the context of TIM. This left us with a total of 275 articles in our

dataset. Then, we classified them into three groups - voluntarist, determinist, and

interactionist, according to their theoretical roots, main arguments, findings, and conclusions.