Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  203 / 322 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 203 / 322 Next Page
Page Background

臺大管理論叢

26

卷第

3

203

perspectives while considering their close interrelationships to evaluate their relative impact

within a common context. The global model of perceived destructive acts is consistent with

the psychological paradigm – stimulus-organism-response. The central ideal in this model is

that key constructs can be defined according to the antecedents→mediators→outcomes

framework for understanding causal relationships.

2. Methodology

This study adopted an exploratory methodology described by the following progression:

qualitative study, quantitative study, and interpretive results. The qualitative research involved

sampling procedures based on purposeful sampling for selecting participants who had

experience with the central phenomenon and maximizing variation sampling. We identified few

participants who could provide in-depth information. This case study involved qualitatively

exploring the perceptions of manufacturers and their responses regarding the destructive

behaviors of distributors by collecting interview data from participants in various firms. The

selected firms were manufacturers X and Y, and a distributor of marketing channel Z.

A survey study was used to test the proposed model of destructive behaviors. We mailed

questionnaires to marketing or sales managers of the Top 500 manufacturing firms in

Taiwan, which were selected based on China Credit Information Service. A total of 500

questionnaires were distributed, and the final sample size was 135 (a return rate of 24%). A

scale was developed based on prior research and our case study. All constructs were

measured using a five-point Likert scale to determine the degree to which the respondent

agreed or disagreed with each items (1 =

totally disagree

to 5 =

totally agree

).

3. Findings

Most of the proposed relationships are strongly supported by the empirical results. The

results are presented and discussed as follows:

(1) Manufacturers perceived more destructive acts of distributors at a higher network

density, but fewer when there was network centrality. This finding indicates that the

two drivers of network structure play different roles in leading perceived destructive

behavior.

(2) The increase of total dependence and relational norms does not diminish the

perceived destructive acts of distributors, and the more normative contracts there

are, the more perceived destructive acts of distributors that occur. This finding