Page 132 - 35-2
P. 132

Internal-External CSR Balance or Favoritism? Exploring the Impacts of Perceived Internal and External
               Corporate Social Responsibility on Employee Organizational Identification from the Attribution Perspective



                        trust, and organizational identification. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 88: 154-
                        163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.03.003
               Ogunfowora, B., Stackhouse, M., and Oh, W. Y. 2018. Media depictions of CEO ethics
                        and stakeholder support of CSR initiatives: The mediating roles of CSR motive
                        attributions and cynicism. Journal of Business Ethics, 150 (2): 525-540. https://

                        doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3173-z
               Pai, D. C., Lai, C. S., Chiu, C. J., and Yang C. F. 2015. Corporate social responsibility
                        and brand advocacy in business-to-business market: The mediated moderating
                        effect of attribution. Journal of Business Ethics, 126 (4): 685-696. https://doi.
                        org/10.1007/s10551-013-1979-5

               Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., and Podsakoff, N. P. 2003. Common
                        method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and
                        recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (5): 879-903.
                        https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
               Podsakoff, P. M., and Organ, D. W. 1986. Self-reports in organizational research:
                        Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12 (4): 531-544. https://doi.
                        org/10.1177/014920638601200408

               Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R., and Armeli, S. 2001. Affective commitment to the
                        organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal
                        of Applied Psychology, 86 (5): 825-836. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-
                        9010.86.5.825

               Rupp, D. E., and Mallory, D. B. 2015. Corporate social responsibility: Psychological,
                        person-centric, and progressing. Annual Reviews of Organizational Psychology
                        and Organizational Behavior, 2: 211-236. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-
                        orgpsych-032414-111505
               Rupp, D. E., Shao, R., Skarlicki, D. P., Paddock, E. L., Kim, T. Y., and Nadisic, T. 2018.
                        Corporate social responsibility and employee engagement: The moderating role
                        of CSR-specific relative autonomy and individualism. Journal of Organizational
                        Behavior, 39 (5): 559-579. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2282

               Scheidler, S., Edinger-Schons, L. M., Spanjol, J., and Wieseke, J. 2019. Scrooge posing as
                        Mother Teresa: How hypocritical social responsibility strategies hurt employees
                        and firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 157 (2): 339-358. https://doi.org/10.1007/
                        s10551-018-3788-3



                                                     124
   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137