Page 233 - 34-2
P. 233

NTU Management Review Vol. 34 No. 2 Aug. 2024




               Bond, Czernkowski, Lee, and Loyeung (2017) examine the impact of both Regulation G
               and C&DIs, they focus on how these regulatory interventions affect firms’ “exclusion”
               behavior, which is different from our focus on the “recognition” behavior. Third, our
               study adds to the stream of research discussing firms’ strategic reporting of special items.

               Prior literature documents that investors, analysts, and compensation committees tend to
               discount income-decreasing special items in assessing firm performance or determining
               managerial compensation (Curtis, Li, and Patrick, 2021; Dechow, Huson, and Sloan, 1994;

               Gaver and Gaver, 1998). The SEC has also devoted its regulatory attention to recurring
               items, making special items a convenient tool for earnings management. Our findings
               further suggest that the reduced regulatory scrutiny of recurring item exclusion can
               mitigate firms’ opportunistic earnings management through special item recognition. This
               highlights the importance of distinguishing opportunistic special items from economically

               driven special items.













































                                                     225
   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238