Page 29 - 34-1
P. 29

NTU Management Review Vol. 34 No. 1 Apr. 2024




               Table 1  The GB Parameters of Each Numerical Example Provided in Borovkova
                       et al. (2007)
                Terms     GB1        GB2        GB3        GB4         GB5            GB6
                 S i (0)  [100, 120] [150, 100]  [110, 90]  [200, 50]  [95, 90, 105]  [100, 90, 95]
                        [0.2, 0.3]  [0.3, 0.2]  [0.3, 0.2]  [0.1, 0.15] [0.2, 0.3, 0.25] [0.25, 0.3, 0.2]
                  σ i
                          [-1, 1]   [-1, 1]   [0.7, 0.3]  [-1, 1]   [1, -0.8, -0.5]  [0.6, 0.8, -1]
                  α i
                                                                   ρ 1,2  = ρ 2,3  = 0.8 ρ 1,2  = ρ 2,3  = 0.8
                        ρ 1,2  = 0.9  ρ 1,2  = 0.3  ρ 1,2  = 0.9  ρ 1,2  = 0.8
                                                                      ρ 1,3  = 0.8  ρ 1,3  = 0.8
                  ρ i,j
                  K        20        -50        104        -140         -30           35
                  T         1         1          1          1            1             1
               Note:  The notations are defined as follows: S i (0): the initial asset price; σ i : volatility; α i : units of the ith
                    asset; ρ i,j : correlation coefficient between S i  and S j ; K: strike price. The dividend yield rates of
                    all assets are assumed to be zero, namely, q i  = 0 and the risk-free interest rate, r, is assumed
                    to be 0.03.
               Table 2  The Numerical Examples of GB Options Provided in Borovkova et al.
                       (2007)
                 Method       GB1        GB2         GB3       GB4         GB5         GB6
                  USD        7.739      16.767     10.824      1.958       7.740       9.009
                  BPW        7.751      16.910     10.844      1.958       7.759       9.026
                   MC        7.744      16.757     10.821      1.966       7.730       9.012
                   se        0.014       0.023      0.018      0.005       0.010       0.015
               Note:  This table presents the pricing results of various GB options computed by three different
                    approaches: USD represents the pricing model proposed in this article, BPW represents
                    the pricing model presented in Borovkova et al. (2007), and MC denotes the Monte Carlo
                    simulation method. The standard error of Monte Carlo simulation is denoted by se.
               and Cathay Financial Holdings Co., Ltd. (2882). The market data of the representative

               companies include the stock price and dividend yield within the period from January 1,
               2020, to August 31, 2022, and all data are from the Taiwan Economic Journal.
                   Assume that the valuation date is August 1, 2022; then, the initial stock of each
               company is S 2330  (0) = 505, S 2603  (0) = 88.3, and S 2882  (0) = 44.55. The average yield of

               each company during this time period is q 2330  = 2.1%, q 2603  = 3.5%, and q 2882  = 4.8%. The
               strike price is assumed to be in-the-money. The historical volatility of each company is
               computed by the annualized standard deviation of stock return, which are σ 2330  = 27.4%,
               σ 2603  = 65.8%, and σ 2882  = 24.1%, respectively. The historical correlation coefficient

               between companies is calculated by the Pearson's correlation method, which are ρ 2330,2882  =
               45.1%, ρ 2603,2882  = 34.0%, and ρ 2330,2603  = 17.1%, respectively. The risk-free interest rate, r,


                                                     21
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34