Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  VII /302 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page VII /302 Next Page
Page Background

The second paper by Kuo, Ho, and Li studies the relationship between community

benefit service expenditure and the tax-exempt interest of not-for-profit hospitals in Taiwan.

Based on the panel data from 43 not-for-profit hospitals in Taiwan from 2006 to 2011, the

regression results indicate that tax-exempt interest has a negative relationship with

uncompensated care services spending (such as providing free medical care and healthcare),

a positive relationship with educational research and development expenses, and no

significant relationship with community benefit service expenditure. The reverse relationship

between tax-exempt interest and uncompensated care services suggests that the main purpose

of granting not-for-profit hospitals tax benefits is not achieved successfully.

The third article by Fang and Chang investigates the impact of non-operating related

party transactions by affiliated business groups on earnings persistence. The empirical

findings suggest that most components of an affiliated business group are audited by auditors

from different CPA firms, which could decrease earnings persistence because affiliated

business groups are likely to conduct related party transactions by means of non-operating

activities. In contrast, if components of the affiliated business group are audited by the same

firm, earnings persistence would not decrease when the CPA firm conducting the audits is

big or the affiliated business group itself is big.

Based on the data of Taiwanese publicly traded firms from 2005 to 2011, Li shows that

audit partner experiences are positively related to the level of comparability of financial

statements for short and middle audit firm tenure engagements. Moreover, the empirical

findings suggest that a higher level of comparability can mitigate investment inefficiency in

capital expenditures; however, it has no effect on investment inefficiency in non-capital

expenditures.

The fifth paper by Wu and Hua provides an evaluation framework of risk management

performance for financial holding companies (FHCs) in Taiwan based on four dimensions

(i.e., financial, customer needs, internal business process, and learning and growth). They

apply a hybrid method of the balanced scorecard (BSC) and the DEMATEL method

combined with the analytic network process (DANP) to obtain the key factors of risk

management. The results coming from the DEMATEL method indicate that strategic,

integration, management, and leadership risks have high prominence in the core factor zone