Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  225 /304 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 225 /304 Next Page
Page Background

225

臺大管理論叢

28

卷第

1

experience: “How happy are you now when writing about the situation?” and “How

enjoyable do you now find it writing about the situation?” These two items rated on a

7-point scale (1 = not at all, 7 = extremely) showed an adequate degree of internal

consistency (α = .88) and were averaged to provide the measure for perceived happiness.

After the emotion induction procedure had been completed, the participants were all

asked to respond to questions about the attractiveness of the transaction values of the

stimuli.

Procedure

Our research method was based on that of Thomas and Morwitz (2005). To

encourage their participation in the study, subjects were asked to answer a question during

a purchase event. When they came to the laboratory, an experimenter told them they

would be engaged in a number of brief tasks. The experimenter then introduced the

decision task, which the participants completed at their own paces.

Dependent Variable

The participants were asked to rate their purchase intention on a 7-point Likert-type

scale ranging from 1 (not at all probable) to 7 (very probable). Two questions were “How

probable is it that you may purchase the battery/pen/notebook/baseball cap?” and “Will

you actively seek out the battery/pen/notebook/baseball cap in a store in order to purchase

it?”

Results

All of the participants in the positive emotional condition group were happier than

those in the control group for all four different products (batteries:

M

= 5.13, SD = .89

versus

M

= 4.21, SD = .81, respectively;

t

= 6.52,

p

< .01; pens:

M

= 5.11, SD = 1.02

versus

M

= 4.18, SD = .75, respectively;

t

= 6.38,

p

< .01; notebooks:

M

= 5.27, SD = .98

versus

M

= 4.12, SD = .71, respectively;

t

= 7.74,

p

< .01; baseball caps:

M

= 5.22, SD =

.97 versus

M

= 4.22, SD = .80, respectively;

t

= 6.69,

p

< .01), and the participants in the

control group were happier than those in the negative emotional condition group

(batteries:

M

= 4.21, SD = .81 versus

M

= 3.28, SD = .67, respectively;

t

= 6.17,

p

< .01;

pens:

M

= 4.18, SD = .75 versus

M

= 3.22, SD = .63, respectively;

t

= 6.28,

p

< .01;

notebooks:

M

= 4.12, SD = .71 versus

M

= 3.25, SD = .65, respectively;

t

= 5.79,

p

< .01;

baseball caps:

M

= 4.22, SD = .80 versus

M

= 3.28, SD = .65, respectively;

t

= 6.20,

p

<

.01). Apart from a simple main effect whereby the emotion induction significantly

influenced the respondents’ ratings of their happiness (batteries:

F

(2, 114) = 18.52,

p

<

.01; pens:

F

(2, 114) = 20.88,

p

< .01; notebooks:

F

(2, 114) = 17.93,

p

< .01; baseball caps: