Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  11 /274 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 11 /274 Next Page
Page Background

11

臺大管理論叢

27

卷第

4

Table 1 Sample Selection

Descriptions

N

Firms listed on TEJ during 1997~2007 (Exclude finance-related institutions)

14,437

Less:

Firm in diversified industrial (Code No.99)

(679)

Firms belonged to regulated industry (Code No.97)

(131)

Industries with less than ten firm-year observation

(241)

Firms’ data unavailable for calculating income smoothing

(5,588)

Firms’ data unavailable for QFII variables

1,188

Firms’ data unavailability for other control variables

(844)

Final empirical samples

5,766

3.2 Variables Measurement

Dependent Variable:

Stock Return (R):

The quality of earnings information helps users to increase the likelihood of correctly

forecasting the outcome of past or present events (SFAC No.2). If income smoothing

improves earnings informativeness, stock prices impound more information about future

earnings (Tucker and Zarowin, 2006). This study follows Collins, Kothari, Shanken, and

Sloan (1994), Lundholm and Myers (2002) as well as Tucker and Zarowin (2006), and uses

ex-dividend annual stock return in year t (R

t

) as the dependent variable, subsequently

examines whether managerial income smoothing behavior embedded in the current stock

price reflects the information about future earnings.

Pivotal Explanatory Variables:

Income Smoothing Measure (IS):

To measure the income smoothing, this study follows the procedures suggested by

Tucker and Zarowin (2006). First, we estimated the discretionary accruals (DA) from the

cross-sectional modified Jones model of Kothari, Leone, and Wasley (2005). The pre-

discretionary income (NDE) is calculated by subtracting discretionary accruals (DA) from

net income. This study uses the current year and the observations of the past four years to

calculate the correlation between the change in discretionary accruals (ΔDA) and the change

in pre-discretionary income (ΔNDE). Second, we measure a firm’s reversed fractional

ranking of the correlation coefficient (between 0 and 1) within its industry-year and refer to

it as the income smoothing measure (IS). This measure implies that there is an underlying

pre-managed income series and that managers use discretionary accruals to make the