Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  39 / 414 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 39 / 414 Next Page
Page Background

臺大管理論叢

27

卷第

1

39

Thus, Harman’s one-factor test was conducted to determine the extent of this variance. The

unrotated factor analysis for pooled data indicated that the first factor accounted for merely

29.57% of the variance. Based on Harman’s one-factor test, CMV was not considered

significant (Podsakoff et al., 2003). A confirmatory factor analysis was estimated in which all

items included in the structural model were restricted to load on a single factor (Podsakoff et

al., 2003). The fit indices indicated a poor model fit. Overall, the results of the two tests

indicated that CMV is not an issue in the current study. Table 1 shows the means, standard

deviations, and correlations matrix for the constructs. Appendix A summarizes the results of

the item description, factor loadings, AVE, and reliability tests.

Table 1 Means, Standard Deviations and Correlations

M D 1

2

3 4 5 6 7 8

1. Asset Specificity

3.26 0.95 1

2. Quality of Customer Interaction 3.24 0.87 0.60* 1

3. Decision-making Uncertainty 2.72 0.94 -0.03 -0.02 1

4. Co-production

2.91 0.75 0.38* 0.35* 0.20* 1

5. Special Treatment Benefits

3.35 1.09 0.26* 0.12* 0.01 0.11* 1

6. Social Benefits

3.25 0.92 0.20* 0.16* -0.01 0.31* 0.11* 1

7. Confidence Benefits

3.41 0.88 0.15* 0.11* -0.07 0.21* 0.12* 0.46* 1

8. Share of Wallet

0.48 0.19 0.36* 0.34* 0.06 0.36* 0.40* 0.29* 0.34* 1

Note: *

p

< 0.05.